alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
authorThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:18:02 +0000 (14:18 -0300)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 5 Oct 2019 10:30:33 +0000 (12:30 +0200)
commit65b7a5a36afb11a6769a70308c1ef3a2afae6bf4
treed90611164d41ad00e7487b75b2eef28de8937b34
parent1347c743ff7df48ca71d82c1c9507aa877a06ab5
alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

commit f18ddc13af981ce3c7b7f26925f099e7c6929aba upstream.

ENOTSUPP is not supposed to be returned to userspace. This was found on an
OpenPower machine, where the RTC does not support set_alarm.

On that system, a clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM, ...) results in
"524 Unknown error 524"

Replace it with EOPNOTSUPP which results in the expected "95 Operation not
supported" error.

Fixes: 1c6b39ad3f01 (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no RTC device is present)
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190903171802.28314-1-cascardo@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c