[mlir] Refactor InterfaceMap to use a sorted vector of interfaces, as opposed to...

[mlir] Refactor InterfaceMap to use a sorted vector of interfaces, as opposed to a DenseMap

A majority of operations have a very small number of interfaces, which means that the cost of using a hash map is generally larger for interface lookups than just a binary search. In the future when there are a number of operations with large amounts of interfaces, we can switch to a hybrid approach that optimizes lookups based on the number of interfaces. For now, however, a binary search is the best approach.

This dropped compile time on a largish TF MLIR module by 20%(half a second).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96085