objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup
authorJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 15:36:38 +0000 (10:36 -0500)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thu, 28 Sep 2017 05:25:54 +0000 (07:25 +0200)
commit607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d
treef370578574533527b649479db1703f0a82db99c3
parentda541b20021c781f8b65492eeaee824e729599eb
objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup

Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:

  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup

and

  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup

With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
pointer with:

  lea    (%rsp),%rbp

instead of:

  mov    %rsp,%rbp

The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a468af8b28a69b83fffc6d7668be9b6fcc873699.1506526584.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c