bonding: set qdisc_tx_busylock to avoid LOCKDEP splat

bonding: set qdisc_tx_busylock to avoid LOCKDEP splat

If a qdisc is installed on a bonding device, its possible to get
following lockdep splat under stress :

 =============================================
 [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 3.6.0+ #211 Not tainted
 ---------------------------------------------
 ping/4876 is trying to acquire lock:
  (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8157a191>] dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830

 but task is already holding lock:
  (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8157a191>] dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock);
   lock(dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 6 locks held by ping/4876:
  #0:  (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815e5030>] raw_sendmsg+0x600/0xc30
  #1:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff815ba4bd>] ip_finish_output+0x12d/0x870
  #2:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff8157a0b0>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x830
  #3:  (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8157a191>] dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830
  #4:  (&bond->lock){++.?..}, at: [<ffffffffa02128c1>] bond_start_xmit+0x31/0x4b0 [bonding]
  #5:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [<ffffffff8157a0b0>] dev_queue_xmit+0x0/0x830

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 4876, comm: ping Not tainted 3.6.0+ #211
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff810a0145>] __lock_acquire+0x715/0x1b80
  [<ffffffff810a256b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x9b/0x100
  [<ffffffff810a1bf2>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1d0
  [<ffffffff8157a191>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830
  [<ffffffff81726b7c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x50
  [<ffffffff8157a191>] ? dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830
  [<ffffffff8106264d>] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x5d/0x90
  [<ffffffff8157a191>] dev_queue_xmit+0xe1/0x830
  [<ffffffff8157a0b0>] ? netdev_pick_tx+0x570/0x570
  [<ffffffffa0212a6a>] bond_start_xmit+0x1da/0x4b0 [bonding]
  [<ffffffff815796d0>] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x240/0x6b0
  [<ffffffff81597c6e>] sch_direct_xmit+0xfe/0x2a0
  [<ffffffff8157a249>] dev_queue_xmit+0x199/0x830
  [<ffffffff8157a0b0>] ? netdev_pick_tx+0x570/0x570
  [<ffffffff815ba96f>] ip_finish_output+0x5df/0x870
  [<ffffffff815ba4bd>] ? ip_finish_output+0x12d/0x870
  [<ffffffff815bb964>] ip_output+0x54/0xf0
  [<ffffffff815bad48>] ip_local_out+0x28/0x90
  [<ffffffff815bc444>] ip_send_skb+0x14/0x50
  [<ffffffff815bc4b2>] ip_push_pending_frames+0x32/0x40
  [<ffffffff815e536a>] raw_sendmsg+0x93a/0xc30
  [<ffffffff8128d570>] ? selinux_file_send_sigiotask+0x1f0/0x1f0
  [<ffffffff8109ddb4>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
  [<ffffffff815f6730>] ? inet_recvmsg+0x220/0x220
  [<ffffffff8109ddb4>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
  [<ffffffff815f6855>] inet_sendmsg+0x125/0x240
  [<ffffffff815f6730>] ? inet_recvmsg+0x220/0x220
  [<ffffffff8155cddb>] sock_sendmsg+0xab/0xe0
  [<ffffffff810a1650>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0xa0/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff810a1650>] ? lock_release_non_nested+0xa0/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff8155d18c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x37c/0x390
  [<ffffffff81195b2a>] ? fsnotify+0x2ca/0x7e0
  [<ffffffff811958e8>] ? fsnotify+0x88/0x7e0
  [<ffffffff81361f36>] ? put_ldisc+0x56/0xd0
  [<ffffffff8116f98a>] ? fget_light+0x3da/0x510
  [<ffffffff8155f6c4>] sys_sendmsg+0x44/0x80
  [<ffffffff8172fc22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Avoid this problem using a distinct lock_class_key for bonding
devices.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>