powerpc/64s: Include cpu header
authorBreno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:54:12 +0000 (11:54 -0300)
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Sun, 25 Nov 2018 06:11:21 +0000 (17:11 +1100)
commit42e2acde1237878462b028f5a27d9cc5bea7502c
tree12521e10f294be5b61afd77957dd874dc737e311
parent54a21b5c941c3c5eb7478a660b6a3119100b2c8d
powerpc/64s: Include cpu header

Current powerpc security.c file is defining functions, as
cpu_show_meltdown(), cpu_show_spectre_v{1,2} and others, that are being
declared at linux/cpu.h header without including the header file that
contains these declarations.

This is being reported by sparse, which thinks that these functions are
static, due to the lack of declaration:

arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:105:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_meltdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:139:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v1' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:161:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v2' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:209:6: warning: symbol 'stf_barrier' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:289:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spec_store_bypass' was not declared. Should it be static?

This patch simply includes the proper header (linux/cpu.h) to match
function definition and declaration.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c