pinctrl: spmi-mpp: Fix pmic_mpp_config_get() to be compliant
authorDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:23:39 +0000 (08:23 -0700)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:16:51 +0000 (11:16 -0800)
commit3b95f64912366bbcd54422b6bc68d8f6dc689dbf
tree84552b0f00389afe5075f9d693f9e44540c5c098
parentdbd7095badc3db1022d68613f9de30723576a2a6
pinctrl: spmi-mpp: Fix pmic_mpp_config_get() to be compliant

[ Upstream commit 0d5b476f8f57fcb06c45fe27681ac47254f63fd2 ]

If you look at "pinconf-groups" in debugfs for ssbi-mpp you'll notice
it looks like nonsense.

The problem is fairly well described in commit 1cf86bc21257 ("pinctrl:
qcom: spmi-gpio: Fix pmic_gpio_config_get() to be compliant") and
commit 05e0c828955c ("pinctrl: msm: Fix msm_config_group_get() to be
compliant"), but it was pointed out that ssbi-mpp has the same
problem.  Let's fix it there too.

NOTE: in case it's helpful to someone reading this, the way to tell
whether to do the -EINVAL or not is to look at the PCONFDUMP for a
given attribute.  If the last element (has_arg) is false then you need
to do the -EINVAL trick.

ALSO NOTE: it seems unlikely that the values returned when we try to
get PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP will actually be printed since "has_arg"
is false for that one, but I guess it's still fine to return different
values so I kept doing that.  It seems like another driver (ssbi-gpio)
uses a custom attribute (PM8XXX_QCOM_PULL_UP_STRENGTH) for something
similar so maybe a future change should do that here too.

Fixes: cfb24f6ebd38 ("pinctrl: Qualcomm SPMI PMIC MPP pin controller driver")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c