alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
authorThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:18:02 +0000 (14:18 -0300)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sat, 5 Oct 2019 11:10:07 +0000 (13:10 +0200)
commit3784576fc63912e44268fbfdd3d676c1830e06a2
treea9cf737f8a594b2384fdbdf091b6ed673380f41f
parent174bbcc560ccf33d83c3a7af300aafaf2a1e9b90
alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

commit f18ddc13af981ce3c7b7f26925f099e7c6929aba upstream.

ENOTSUPP is not supposed to be returned to userspace. This was found on an
OpenPower machine, where the RTC does not support set_alarm.

On that system, a clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM, ...) results in
"524 Unknown error 524"

Replace it with EOPNOTSUPP which results in the expected "95 Operation not
supported" error.

Fixes: 1c6b39ad3f01 (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no RTC device is present)
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190903171802.28314-1-cascardo@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c