x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
authorThiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:49:17 +0000 (01:49 -0300)
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:52:08 +0000 (22:52 +1000)
commit284e21fab2cfcf90dacce565e0b12f29e5df00c1
treef3ff0d324d2c19857a4e842a1c7369e0421e1fc2
parente740815a97e2b6d6446792f4328378e66de166d1
x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header

Now that generic code doesn't reference them, move sme_active() and
sme_me_mask to x86's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>.

Also remove the export for sme_active() since it's only used in files that
won't be built as modules. sme_me_mask on the other hand is used in
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c (via __sme_set() and __psp_pa()) which can be built as a
module so its export needs to stay.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
arch/s390/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h
arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
include/linux/mem_encrypt.h