x86/fpu: Use _Alignof to avoid undefined behavior in TYPE_ALIGN
authorYingChi Long <me@inclyc.cn>
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 00:55:35 +0000 (08:55 +0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tue, 24 Jan 2023 06:24:42 +0000 (07:24 +0100)
commit2705a9548594888d6abcececdb898cbedd9c853b
treeaf0684dde4f10b0bf15bdc0ff37adb273821f658
parenta18417e27ed8dde4e774fb0611a10479d0c8eed1
x86/fpu: Use _Alignof to avoid undefined behavior in TYPE_ALIGN

commit 55228db2697c09abddcb9487c3d9fa5854a932cd upstream.

WG14 N2350 specifies that it is an undefined behavior to have type
definitions within offsetof", see

  https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm

This specification is also part of C23.

Therefore, replace the TYPE_ALIGN macro with the _Alignof builtin to
avoid undefined behavior. (_Alignof itself is C11 and the kernel is
built with -gnu11).

ISO C11 _Alignof is subtly different from the GNU C extension
__alignof__. Latter is the preferred alignment and _Alignof the
minimal alignment. For long long on x86 these are 8 and 4
respectively.

The macro TYPE_ALIGN's behavior matches _Alignof rather than
__alignof__.

  [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: YingChi Long <me@inclyc.cn>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220925153151.2467884-1-me@inclyc.cn
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c