bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
authorAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 23 Mar 2022 23:05:47 +0000 (16:05 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 24 Mar 2022 02:00:33 +0000 (19:00 -0700)
commit25cb5b7ac6a7f7943e22a6831b74a6aa964d2a0c
tree4053d164b28e3260930cf6270e5cd9f02a73978d
parentf334f5668bedf7307f6df1d98b14f55902931926
bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example

It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion
and the example in the former is confusing.  Some developers think that
it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working.  Change example
to explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Fixes: 3e9b3112ec74 ("add basic register-field manipulation macros")
Depends-on: 8bd9cb51daac ("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@semihalf.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/linux/bitfield.h