selftests/bpf: Relax time_tai test for equal timestamps in tai_forward
authorYiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:29:11 +0000 (18:29 +0000)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:35:25 +0000 (15:35 -0800)
commit1e1fe2bd87ac923b1e9a74871f567fc832104104
tree0b029209abfd18b6fe567d7edc8240f2b591d2d8
parent85e60760d2558e7cae085b2f1157e2015141280d
selftests/bpf: Relax time_tai test for equal timestamps in tai_forward

[ Upstream commit e1ba7f64b192f083b4423644be03bb9e3dc8ae84 ]

We're observing test flakiness on an arm64 platform which might not
have timestamps as precise as x86. The test log looks like:

  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_open 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:test_run 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts1 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_ts2 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:FAIL:tai_forward unexpected tai_forward: actual 1702348135471494160 <= expected 1702348135471494160
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_gettime 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts1 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_future_ts2 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts1 0 nsec
  test_time_tai:PASS:tai_range_ts2 0 nsec
  #199     time_tai:FAIL

This patch changes ASSERT_GT to ASSERT_GE in the tai_forward assertion
so that equal timestamps are permitted.

Fixes: 64e15820b987 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF-helper test for CLOCK_TAI access")
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231212182911.3784108-1-zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/time_tai.c