x86/alternative: Remove noinline from __ibt_endbr_seal[_end]() stubs
authorMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:38:03 +0000 (19:38 +0800)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:54:43 +0000 (12:54 +0100)
commit023e59d4cee91dd3ca811eb01db2c5fb9f783dc2
treed4acbfe4073c34360f71bf2f8ed796955e742719
parentb7b275e60bcd5f89771e865a8239325f86d9927d
x86/alternative: Remove noinline from __ibt_endbr_seal[_end]() stubs

Due to the explicit 'noinline' GCC-7.3 is not able to optimize away the
argument setup of:

apply_ibt_endbr(__ibt_endbr_seal, __ibt_enbr_seal_end);

even when X86_KERNEL_IBT=n and the function is an empty stub, which leads
to link errors due to missing __ibt_endbr_seal* symbols:

ld: arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: in function `alternative_instructions':
alternative.c:(.init.text+0x15d): undefined reference to `__ibt_endbr_seal_end'
ld: alternative.c:(.init.text+0x164): undefined reference to `__ibt_endbr_seal'

Remove the explicit 'noinline' to help gcc optimize them away.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221011113803.956808-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c