mtd: rawnand: gpmi: validate controller clock rate
[ Upstream commit
15e27d197a7ea69b4643791ca2f8467fdd998359 ]
What to do when the real rate of the gpmi clock is not equal to the
required one? The solutions proposed in [1] did not lead to a conclusion
on how to validate the clock rate, so, inspired by the document [2], I
consider the rate correct only if not lower or equal to the rate of the
previous edo mode. In fact, in chapter 4.16.2 (NV-DDR) of the document [2],
it is written that "If the host selects timing mode n, then its clock
period shall be faster than the clock period of timing mode n-1 and
slower than or equal to the clock period of timing mode n.". I thought
that it could therefore also be used in this case, without therefore
having to define the valid rate ranges empirically.
For example, suppose that gpmi_nfc_compute_timings() is called to set
edo mode 5 (100MHz) but the rate returned by clk_round_rate() is 80MHz
(edo mode 4). In this case gpmi_nfc_compute_timings() will return error,
and will be called again to set edo mode 4, which this time will be
successful.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/
20210702065350.209646-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
[2] http://www.onfi.org/-/media/client/onfi/specs/onfi_3_0_gold.pdf?la=en
Co-developed-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220118095434.35081-4-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>