X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=isl_coalesce.c;h=ed80560c022a2abfdf34efe739eab0fe215e295a;hb=da1dc20cb7aa4509e375f703c35beaf27dfa4a15;hp=8d06e2e843c9e0c3bb766e2a6201a1606170241a;hpb=6817c5f804b1f77ab174af03b960e7c2e10fe342;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fisl.git diff --git a/isl_coalesce.c b/isl_coalesce.c index 8d06e2e..ed80560 100644 --- a/isl_coalesce.c +++ b/isl_coalesce.c @@ -1,13 +1,15 @@ /* * Copyright 2008-2009 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven * Copyright 2010 INRIA Saclay + * Copyright 2012-2013 Ecole Normale Superieure * - * Use of this software is governed by the GNU LGPLv2.1 license + * Use of this software is governed by the MIT license * * Written by Sven Verdoolaege, K.U.Leuven, Departement * Computerwetenschappen, Celestijnenlaan 200A, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium * and INRIA Saclay - Ile-de-France, Parc Club Orsay Universite, * ZAC des vignes, 4 rue Jacques Monod, 91893 Orsay, France + * and Ecole Normale Superieure, 45 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris, France */ #include "isl_map_private.h" @@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include "isl_tab.h" #include +#include #define STATUS_ERROR -1 #define STATUS_REDUNDANT 1 @@ -38,24 +41,24 @@ static int status_in(isl_int *ineq, struct isl_tab *tab) } } -/* Compute the position of the equalities of basic map "i" - * with respect to basic map "j". +/* Compute the position of the equalities of basic map "bmap_i" + * with respect to the basic map represented by "tab_j". * The resulting array has twice as many entries as the number * of equalities corresponding to the two inequalties to which * each equality corresponds. */ -static int *eq_status_in(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, - struct isl_tab **tabs) +static int *eq_status_in(__isl_keep isl_basic_map *bmap_i, + struct isl_tab *tab_j) { int k, l; - int *eq = isl_calloc_array(map->ctx, int, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq); + int *eq = isl_calloc_array(bmap_i->ctx, int, 2 * bmap_i->n_eq); unsigned dim; - dim = isl_basic_map_total_dim(map->p[i]); - for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_eq; ++k) { + dim = isl_basic_map_total_dim(bmap_i); + for (k = 0; k < bmap_i->n_eq; ++k) { for (l = 0; l < 2; ++l) { - isl_seq_neg(map->p[i]->eq[k], map->p[i]->eq[k], 1+dim); - eq[2 * k + l] = status_in(map->p[i]->eq[k], tabs[j]); + isl_seq_neg(bmap_i->eq[k], bmap_i->eq[k], 1+dim); + eq[2 * k + l] = status_in(bmap_i->eq[k], tab_j); if (eq[2 * k + l] == STATUS_ERROR) goto error; } @@ -70,22 +73,23 @@ error: return NULL; } -/* Compute the position of the inequalities of basic map "i" - * with respect to basic map "j". +/* Compute the position of the inequalities of basic map "bmap_i" + * (also represented by "tab_i", if not NULL) with respect to the basic map + * represented by "tab_j". */ -static int *ineq_status_in(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, - struct isl_tab **tabs) +static int *ineq_status_in(__isl_keep isl_basic_map *bmap_i, + struct isl_tab *tab_i, struct isl_tab *tab_j) { int k; - unsigned n_eq = map->p[i]->n_eq; - int *ineq = isl_calloc_array(map->ctx, int, map->p[i]->n_ineq); + unsigned n_eq = bmap_i->n_eq; + int *ineq = isl_calloc_array(bmap_i->ctx, int, bmap_i->n_ineq); - for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq; ++k) { - if (isl_tab_is_redundant(tabs[i], n_eq + k)) { + for (k = 0; k < bmap_i->n_ineq; ++k) { + if (tab_i && isl_tab_is_redundant(tab_i, n_eq + k)) { ineq[k] = STATUS_REDUNDANT; continue; } - ineq[k] = status_in(map->p[i]->ineq[k], tabs[j]); + ineq[k] = status_in(bmap_i->ineq[k], tab_j); if (ineq[k] == STATUS_ERROR) goto error; if (ineq[k] == STATUS_SEPARATE) @@ -294,6 +298,124 @@ static int check_facets(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, return fuse(map, i, j, tabs, NULL, ineq_i, NULL, ineq_j, NULL); } +/* Check if basic map "i" contains the basic map represented + * by the tableau "tab". + */ +static int contains(struct isl_map *map, int i, int *ineq_i, + struct isl_tab *tab) +{ + int k, l; + unsigned dim; + + dim = isl_basic_map_total_dim(map->p[i]); + for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_eq; ++k) { + for (l = 0; l < 2; ++l) { + int stat; + isl_seq_neg(map->p[i]->eq[k], map->p[i]->eq[k], 1+dim); + stat = status_in(map->p[i]->eq[k], tab); + if (stat != STATUS_VALID) + return 0; + } + } + + for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq; ++k) { + int stat; + if (ineq_i[k] == STATUS_REDUNDANT) + continue; + stat = status_in(map->p[i]->ineq[k], tab); + if (stat != STATUS_VALID) + return 0; + } + return 1; +} + +/* Basic map "i" has an inequality (say "k") that is adjacent + * to some inequality of basic map "j". All the other inequalities + * are valid for "j". + * Check if basic map "j" forms an extension of basic map "i". + * + * Note that this function is only called if some of the equalities or + * inequalities of basic map "j" do cut basic map "i". The function is + * correct even if there are no such cut constraints, but in that case + * the additional checks performed by this function are overkill. + * + * In particular, we replace constraint k, say f >= 0, by constraint + * f <= -1, add the inequalities of "j" that are valid for "i" + * and check if the result is a subset of basic map "j". + * If so, then we know that this result is exactly equal to basic map "j" + * since all its constraints are valid for basic map "j". + * By combining the valid constraints of "i" (all equalities and all + * inequalities except "k") and the valid constraints of "j" we therefore + * obtain a basic map that is equal to their union. + * In this case, there is no need to perform a rollback of the tableau + * since it is going to be destroyed in fuse(). + * + * + * |\__ |\__ + * | \__ | \__ + * | \_ => | \__ + * |_______| _ |_________\ + * + * + * |\ |\ + * | \ | \ + * | \ | \ + * | | | \ + * | ||\ => | \ + * | || \ | \ + * | || | | | + * |__||_/ |_____/ + */ +static int is_adj_ineq_extension(__isl_keep isl_map *map, int i, int j, + struct isl_tab **tabs, int *eq_i, int *ineq_i, int *eq_j, int *ineq_j) +{ + int k; + struct isl_tab_undo *snap; + unsigned n_eq = map->p[i]->n_eq; + unsigned total = isl_basic_map_total_dim(map->p[i]); + int r; + + if (isl_tab_extend_cons(tabs[i], 1 + map->p[j]->n_ineq) < 0) + return -1; + + for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq; ++k) + if (ineq_i[k] == STATUS_ADJ_INEQ) + break; + if (k >= map->p[i]->n_ineq) + isl_die(isl_map_get_ctx(map), isl_error_internal, + "ineq_i should have exactly one STATUS_ADJ_INEQ", + return -1); + + snap = isl_tab_snap(tabs[i]); + + if (isl_tab_unrestrict(tabs[i], n_eq + k) < 0) + return -1; + + isl_seq_neg(map->p[i]->ineq[k], map->p[i]->ineq[k], 1 + total); + isl_int_sub_ui(map->p[i]->ineq[k][0], map->p[i]->ineq[k][0], 1); + r = isl_tab_add_ineq(tabs[i], map->p[i]->ineq[k]); + isl_seq_neg(map->p[i]->ineq[k], map->p[i]->ineq[k], 1 + total); + isl_int_sub_ui(map->p[i]->ineq[k][0], map->p[i]->ineq[k][0], 1); + if (r < 0) + return -1; + + for (k = 0; k < map->p[j]->n_ineq; ++k) { + if (ineq_j[k] != STATUS_VALID) + continue; + if (isl_tab_add_ineq(tabs[i], map->p[j]->ineq[k]) < 0) + return -1; + } + + if (contains(map, j, ineq_j, tabs[i])) + return fuse(map, i, j, tabs, eq_i, ineq_i, eq_j, ineq_j, NULL); + + if (isl_tab_rollback(tabs[i], snap) < 0) + return -1; + + return 0; +} + + /* Both basic maps have at least one inequality with and adjacent * (but opposite) inequality in the other basic map. * Check that there are no cut constraints and that there is only @@ -320,53 +442,40 @@ static int check_facets(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, * | | * | | * |___| + * + * If there are some cut constraints on one side, then we may + * still be able to fuse the two basic maps, but we need to perform + * some additional checks in is_adj_ineq_extension. */ static int check_adj_ineq(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, - struct isl_tab **tabs, int *ineq_i, int *ineq_j) + struct isl_tab **tabs, int *eq_i, int *ineq_i, int *eq_j, int *ineq_j) { - int changed = 0; + int count_i, count_j; + int cut_i, cut_j; - if (any(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_CUT) || - any(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_CUT)) - /* ADJ INEQ CUT */ - ; - else if (count(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ) == 1 && - count(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ) == 1) - changed = fuse(map, i, j, tabs, NULL, ineq_i, NULL, ineq_j, NULL); - /* else ADJ INEQ TOO MANY */ + count_i = count(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ); + count_j = count(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ); - return changed; -} + if (count_i != 1 && count_j != 1) + return 0; -/* Check if basic map "i" contains the basic map represented - * by the tableau "tab". - */ -static int contains(struct isl_map *map, int i, int *ineq_i, - struct isl_tab *tab) -{ - int k, l; - unsigned dim; + cut_i = any(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT) || + any(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_CUT); + cut_j = any(eq_j, 2 * map->p[j]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT) || + any(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_CUT); - dim = isl_basic_map_total_dim(map->p[i]); - for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_eq; ++k) { - for (l = 0; l < 2; ++l) { - int stat; - isl_seq_neg(map->p[i]->eq[k], map->p[i]->eq[k], 1+dim); - stat = status_in(map->p[i]->eq[k], tab); - if (stat != STATUS_VALID) - return 0; - } - } + if (!cut_i && !cut_j && count_i == 1 && count_j == 1) + return fuse(map, i, j, tabs, NULL, ineq_i, NULL, ineq_j, NULL); - for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq; ++k) { - int stat; - if (ineq_i[k] == STATUS_REDUNDANT) - continue; - stat = status_in(map->p[i]->ineq[k], tab); - if (stat != STATUS_VALID) - return 0; - } - return 1; + if (count_i == 1 && !cut_i) + return is_adj_ineq_extension(map, i, j, tabs, + eq_i, ineq_i, eq_j, ineq_j); + + if (count_j == 1 && !cut_j) + return is_adj_ineq_extension(map, j, i, tabs, + eq_j, ineq_j, eq_i, ineq_i); + + return 0; } /* Basic map "i" has an inequality "k" that is adjacent to some equality @@ -379,7 +488,7 @@ static int contains(struct isl_map *map, int i, int *ineq_i, * map with exactly the other basic map (we already know that this * other basic map is included in the extension, because there * were no "cut" inequalities in "i") and we can replace the - * two basic maps by thie extension. + * two basic maps by this extension. * ____ _____ * / || / | * / || / | @@ -387,7 +496,7 @@ static int contains(struct isl_map *map, int i, int *ineq_i, * \ || \ | * \___|| \____| */ -static int is_extension(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, int k, +static int is_adj_eq_extension(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, int k, struct isl_tab **tabs, int *eq_i, int *ineq_i, int *eq_j, int *ineq_j) { int changed = 0; @@ -1044,11 +1153,12 @@ static int check_adj_eq(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, /* ADJ EQ TOO MANY */ return 0; - for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq ; ++k) + for (k = 0; k < map->p[i]->n_ineq; ++k) if (ineq_i[k] == STATUS_ADJ_EQ) break; - changed = is_extension(map, i, j, k, tabs, eq_i, ineq_i, eq_j, ineq_j); + changed = is_adj_eq_extension(map, i, j, k, tabs, + eq_i, ineq_i, eq_j, ineq_j); if (changed) return changed; @@ -1160,6 +1270,7 @@ unbounded: * can be represented by a single basic map. * If so, replace the pair by the single basic map and return 1. * Otherwise, return 0; + * The two basic maps are assumed to live in the same local space. * * We first check the effect of each constraint of one basic map * on the other basic map. @@ -1195,7 +1306,15 @@ unbounded: * => the pair can be replaced by a basic map consisting * of the valid constraints in both basic maps * - * 4. there is a single adjacent pair of an inequality and an equality, + * 4. one basic map has a single adjacent inequality, while the other + * constraints are "valid". The other basic map has some + * "cut" constraints, but replacing the adjacent inequality by + * its opposite and adding the valid constraints of the other + * basic map results in a subset of the other basic map + * => the pair can be replaced by a basic map consisting + * of the valid constraints in both basic maps + * + * 5. there is a single adjacent pair of an inequality and an equality, * the other constraints of the basic map containing the inequality are * "valid". Moreover, if the inequality the basic map is relaxed * and then turned into an equality, then resulting facet lies @@ -1203,7 +1322,7 @@ unbounded: * => the pair can be replaced by the basic map containing * the inequality, with the inequality relaxed. * - * 5. there is a single adjacent pair of an inequality and an equality, + * 6. there is a single adjacent pair of an inequality and an equality, * the other constraints of the basic map containing the inequality are * "valid". Moreover, the facets corresponding to both * the inequality and the equality can be wrapped around their @@ -1212,7 +1331,7 @@ unbounded: * of the valid constraints in both basic maps together * with all wrapping constraints * - * 6. one of the basic maps extends beyond the other by at most one. + * 7. one of the basic maps extends beyond the other by at most one. * Moreover, the facets corresponding to the cut constraints and * the pieces of the other basic map at offset one from these cut * constraints can be wrapped around their ridges to include @@ -1221,7 +1340,7 @@ unbounded: * of the valid constraints in both basic maps together * with all wrapping constraints * - * 7. the two basic maps live in adjacent hyperplanes. In principle + * 8. the two basic maps live in adjacent hyperplanes. In principle * such sets can always be combined through wrapping, but we impose * that there is only one such pair, to avoid overeager coalescing. * @@ -1229,7 +1348,7 @@ unbounded: * corresponding to the basic maps. When the basic maps are dropped * or combined, the tableaus are modified accordingly. */ -static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, +static int coalesce_local_pair(__isl_keep isl_map *map, int i, int j, struct isl_tab **tabs) { int changed = 0; @@ -1238,7 +1357,7 @@ static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, int *ineq_i = NULL; int *ineq_j = NULL; - eq_i = eq_status_in(map, i, j, tabs); + eq_i = eq_status_in(map->p[i], tabs[j]); if (!eq_i) goto error; if (any(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_ERROR)) @@ -1246,7 +1365,7 @@ static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, if (any(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_SEPARATE)) goto done; - eq_j = eq_status_in(map, j, i, tabs); + eq_j = eq_status_in(map->p[j], tabs[i]); if (!eq_j) goto error; if (any(eq_j, 2 * map->p[j]->n_eq, STATUS_ERROR)) @@ -1254,7 +1373,7 @@ static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, if (any(eq_j, 2 * map->p[j]->n_eq, STATUS_SEPARATE)) goto done; - ineq_i = ineq_status_in(map, i, j, tabs); + ineq_i = ineq_status_in(map->p[i], tabs[i], tabs[j]); if (!ineq_i) goto error; if (any(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_ERROR)) @@ -1262,7 +1381,7 @@ static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, if (any(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_SEPARATE)) goto done; - ineq_j = ineq_status_in(map, j, i, tabs); + ineq_j = ineq_status_in(map->p[j], tabs[j], tabs[i]); if (!ineq_j) goto error; if (any(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_ERROR)) @@ -1294,10 +1413,8 @@ static int coalesce_pair(struct isl_map *map, int i, int j, /* BAD ADJ INEQ */ } else if (any(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ) || any(ineq_j, map->p[j]->n_ineq, STATUS_ADJ_INEQ)) { - if (!any(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT) && - !any(eq_j, 2 * map->p[j]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT)) - changed = check_adj_ineq(map, i, j, tabs, - ineq_i, ineq_j); + changed = check_adj_ineq(map, i, j, tabs, + eq_i, ineq_i, eq_j, ineq_j); } else { if (!any(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT) && !any(eq_j, 2 * map->p[j]->n_eq, STATUS_CUT)) @@ -1321,6 +1438,190 @@ error: return -1; } +/* Do the two basic maps live in the same local space, i.e., + * do they have the same (known) divs? + * If either basic map has any unknown divs, then we can only assume + * that they do not live in the same local space. + */ +static int same_divs(__isl_keep isl_basic_map *bmap1, + __isl_keep isl_basic_map *bmap2) +{ + int i; + int known; + int total; + + if (!bmap1 || !bmap2) + return -1; + if (bmap1->n_div != bmap2->n_div) + return 0; + + if (bmap1->n_div == 0) + return 1; + + known = isl_basic_map_divs_known(bmap1); + if (known < 0 || !known) + return known; + known = isl_basic_map_divs_known(bmap2); + if (known < 0 || !known) + return known; + + total = isl_basic_map_total_dim(bmap1); + for (i = 0; i < bmap1->n_div; ++i) + if (!isl_seq_eq(bmap1->div[i], bmap2->div[i], 2 + total)) + return 0; + + return 1; +} + +/* Given two basic maps "i" and "j", where the divs of "i" form a subset + * of those of "j", check if basic map "j" is a subset of basic map "i" + * and, if so, drop basic map "j". + * + * We first expand the divs of basic map "i" to match those of basic map "j", + * using the divs and expansion computed by the caller. + * Then we check if all constraints of the expanded "i" are valid for "j". + */ +static int coalesce_subset(__isl_keep isl_map *map, int i, int j, + struct isl_tab **tabs, __isl_keep isl_mat *div, int *exp) +{ + isl_basic_map *bmap; + int changed = 0; + int *eq_i = NULL; + int *ineq_i = NULL; + + bmap = isl_basic_map_copy(map->p[i]); + bmap = isl_basic_set_expand_divs(bmap, isl_mat_copy(div), exp); + + if (!bmap) + goto error; + + eq_i = eq_status_in(bmap, tabs[j]); + if (!eq_i) + goto error; + if (any(eq_i, 2 * bmap->n_eq, STATUS_ERROR)) + goto error; + if (any(eq_i, 2 * bmap->n_eq, STATUS_SEPARATE)) + goto done; + + ineq_i = ineq_status_in(bmap, NULL, tabs[j]); + if (!ineq_i) + goto error; + if (any(ineq_i, bmap->n_ineq, STATUS_ERROR)) + goto error; + if (any(ineq_i, bmap->n_ineq, STATUS_SEPARATE)) + goto done; + + if (all(eq_i, 2 * map->p[i]->n_eq, STATUS_VALID) && + all(ineq_i, map->p[i]->n_ineq, STATUS_VALID)) { + drop(map, j, tabs); + changed = 1; + } + +done: + isl_basic_map_free(bmap); + free(eq_i); + free(ineq_i); + return 0; +error: + isl_basic_map_free(bmap); + free(eq_i); + free(ineq_i); + return -1; +} + +/* Check if the basic map "j" is a subset of basic map "i", + * assuming that "i" has fewer divs that "j". + * If not, then we change the order. + * + * If the two basic maps have the same number of divs, then + * they must necessarily be different. Otherwise, we would have + * called coalesce_local_pair. We therefore don't do try anyhing + * in this case. + * + * We first check if the divs of "i" are all known and form a subset + * of those of "j". If so, we pass control over to coalesce_subset. + */ +static int check_coalesce_subset(__isl_keep isl_map *map, int i, int j, + struct isl_tab **tabs) +{ + int known; + isl_mat *div_i, *div_j, *div; + int *exp1 = NULL; + int *exp2 = NULL; + isl_ctx *ctx; + int subset; + + if (map->p[i]->n_div == map->p[j]->n_div) + return 0; + if (map->p[j]->n_div < map->p[i]->n_div) + return check_coalesce_subset(map, j, i, tabs); + + known = isl_basic_map_divs_known(map->p[i]); + if (known < 0 || !known) + return known; + + ctx = isl_map_get_ctx(map); + + div_i = isl_basic_map_get_divs(map->p[i]); + div_j = isl_basic_map_get_divs(map->p[j]); + + if (!div_i || !div_j) + goto error; + + exp1 = isl_alloc_array(ctx, int, div_i->n_row); + exp2 = isl_alloc_array(ctx, int, div_j->n_row); + if (!exp1 || !exp2) + goto error; + + div = isl_merge_divs(div_i, div_j, exp1, exp2); + if (!div) + goto error; + + if (div->n_row == div_j->n_row) + subset = coalesce_subset(map, i, j, tabs, div, exp1); + else + subset = 0; + + isl_mat_free(div); + + isl_mat_free(div_i); + isl_mat_free(div_j); + + free(exp2); + free(exp1); + + return subset; +error: + isl_mat_free(div_i); + isl_mat_free(div_j); + free(exp1); + free(exp2); + return -1; +} + +/* Check if the union of the given pair of basic maps + * can be represented by a single basic map. + * If so, replace the pair by the single basic map and return 1. + * Otherwise, return 0; + * + * We first check if the two basic maps live in the same local space. + * If so, we do the complete check. Otherwise, we check if one is + * an obvious subset of the other. + */ +static int coalesce_pair(__isl_keep isl_map *map, int i, int j, + struct isl_tab **tabs) +{ + int same; + + same = same_divs(map->p[i], map->p[j]); + if (same < 0) + return -1; + if (same) + return coalesce_local_pair(map, i, j, tabs); + + return check_coalesce_subset(map, i, j, tabs); +} + static struct isl_map *coalesce(struct isl_map *map, struct isl_tab **tabs) { int i, j; @@ -1344,6 +1645,16 @@ error: /* For each pair of basic maps in the map, check if the union of the two * can be represented by a single basic map. * If so, replace the pair by the single basic map and start over. + * + * Since we are constructing the tableaus of the basic maps anyway, + * we exploit them to detect implicit equalities and redundant constraints. + * This also helps the coalescing as it can ignore the redundant constraints. + * In order to avoid confusion, we make all implicit equalities explicit + * in the basic maps. We don't call isl_basic_map_gauss, though, + * as that may affect the number of constraints. + * This means that we have to call isl_basic_map_gauss at the end + * of the computation to ensure that the basic maps are not left + * in an unexpected state. */ struct isl_map *isl_map_coalesce(struct isl_map *map) { @@ -1358,7 +1669,8 @@ struct isl_map *isl_map_coalesce(struct isl_map *map) if (map->n <= 1) return map; - map = isl_map_align_divs(map); + map = isl_map_sort_divs(map); + map = isl_map_cow(map); tabs = isl_calloc_array(map->ctx, struct isl_tab *, map->n); if (!tabs) @@ -1372,6 +1684,10 @@ struct isl_map *isl_map_coalesce(struct isl_map *map) if (!ISL_F_ISSET(map->p[i], ISL_BASIC_MAP_NO_IMPLICIT)) if (isl_tab_detect_implicit_equalities(tabs[i]) < 0) goto error; + map->p[i] = isl_tab_make_equalities_explicit(tabs[i], + map->p[i]); + if (!map->p[i]) + goto error; if (!ISL_F_ISSET(map->p[i], ISL_BASIC_MAP_NO_REDUNDANT)) if (isl_tab_detect_redundant(tabs[i]) < 0) goto error; @@ -1386,6 +1702,7 @@ struct isl_map *isl_map_coalesce(struct isl_map *map) for (i = 0; i < map->n; ++i) { map->p[i] = isl_basic_map_update_from_tab(map->p[i], tabs[i]); + map->p[i] = isl_basic_map_gauss(map->p[i], NULL); map->p[i] = isl_basic_map_finalize(map->p[i]); if (!map->p[i]) goto error;