X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=gettext-tools%2Fdoc%2Fgettext_12.html;h=0e8d574dd536401e223d58b4a4c4a55384ec0508;hb=refs%2Ftags%2Fupstream%2F0.18.3.2;hp=0ea6cba7059ca921af98061f6ae3df3544c7bf29;hpb=90a3363ce7c017439e9953fd5e832fbef8db0dd5;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Fgettext.git diff --git a/gettext-tools/doc/gettext_12.html b/gettext-tools/doc/gettext_12.html index 0ea6cba..0e8d574 100644 --- a/gettext-tools/doc/gettext_12.html +++ b/gettext-tools/doc/gettext_12.html @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ from gettext.texi on 7 January 2014 -->gettext
necessarily brings their
package under the protective wing of the GNU General Public License or
-the GNU Library General Public License, when they do not want to make
+the GNU Lesser General Public License, when they do not want to make
their program free, or want other kinds of freedom. The simplest
answer is ânormally notâ.
The gettext-runtime
part of GNU gettext
, i.e. the
-contents of libintl
, is covered by the GNU Library General Public
+contents of libintl
, is covered by the GNU Lesser General Public
License. The gettext-tools
part of GNU gettext
, i.e. the
rest of the GNU gettext
package, is covered by the GNU General
Public License.
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ all of GNU, giving myself the duty of one small GNU package per week
or so, taking many weeks or months for bigger packages. But it does
not work this way. I first did all the things I'm responsible for.
I've nothing against some missionary work on other maintainers, but
-I'm also loosing a lot of energy over it--same debates over again.
+I'm also losing a lot of energy over it--same debates over again.
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ have more information about this.
- + Suppose you are translating a PO file, and it contains an entry like this:
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ of messages.
-
+
Here a more details. The GNU libintl
library (but not the
corresponding functions in GNU libc
) supports an environment variable
GETTEXT_LOG_UNTRANSLATED
. The GNU libintl
library will