{ 0x0ab7, 0x215a }, /* fivesixths ⅚ VULGAR FRACTION FIVE SIXTHS */
{ 0x0ab8, 0x2105 }, /* careof ℅ CARE OF */
{ 0x0abb, 0x2012 }, /* figdash ‒ FIGURE DASH */
- { 0x0abc, 0x2329 }, /* leftanglebracket 〈 LEFT-POINTING ANGLE BRACKET */
+ { 0x0abc, 0x27e8 }, /* leftanglebracket ⟨ MATHEMATICAL LEFT ANGLE BRACKET */
{ 0x0abd, 0x002e }, /* decimalpoint . FULL STOP */
- { 0x0abe, 0x232a }, /* rightanglebracket 〉 RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE BRACKET */
+ { 0x0abe, 0x27e9 }, /* rightanglebracket ⟩ MATHEMATICAL RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET */
/* 0x0abf marker ? ??? */
{ 0x0ac3, 0x215b }, /* oneeighth ⅛ VULGAR FRACTION ONE EIGHTH */
{ 0x0ac4, 0x215c }, /* threeeighths ⅜ VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS */
keysym == XKB_KEY_KP_Enter || keysym == XKB_KEY_KP_Equal)
return keysym & 0x7f;
- /* also check for directly encoded 24-bit UCS characters */
- if ((keysym & 0xff000000) == 0x01000000)
- return keysym & 0x00ffffff;
+ /* also check for directly encoded Unicode codepoints */
+ /*
+ * In theory, this is supposed to start from 0x100100, such that the ASCII
+ * range, which is already covered by 0x00-0xff, can't be encoded in two
+ * ways. However, changing this after a couple of decades probably won't
+ * go well, so it stays as it is.
+ */
+ if (0x01000000 <= keysym && keysym <= 0x0110ffff)
+ return keysym - 0x01000000;
/* search main table */
return bin_search(keysymtab, ARRAY_SIZE(keysymtab) - 1, keysym);