"typical" usage: whatever that may be!
]
-[endsect]
+[endsect] [/section:interp Interpreting these Results]
[section:getting_best Getting the Best Performance from this Library: Compiler and Compiler Options]
[caution
You should exercise extreme caution when interpreting
-these results, relative performance may vary by platform, the tests use
-data that gives good code coverage of /our/ code, but which may skew the
+these results, relative performance may vary by platform, by compiler options settings,
+the tests use data that gives good code coverage of /our/ code, but which may skew the
results towards the corner cases. Finally, remember that different
libraries make different choices with regard to performance verses
numerical stability.
On Linux with GCC, we can also compare to the TR1 functions, and to GSL and RMath:
-[table_Library_Comparison_with_GNU_C_version_5_1_0_on_linux]
+[table_Library_Comparison_with_GNU_C_version_5_3_0_on_linux]
And finally we can compare the statistical distributions to GSL, RMath and DCDFLIB:
-[table_Distribution_performance_comparison_with_GNU_C_version_5_1_0_on_linux]
+[table_Distribution_performance_comparison_with_GNU_C_version_5_3_0_on_linux]
[endsect] [/section:comparisons Comparisons to Other Open Source Libraries]
[endsect] [/section:perf_test_app The Performance Test Applications]
-[endmathpart]
+[endmathpart] [/mathpart perf Performance]
[/
Copyright 2006 John Maddock and Paul A. Bristow.