Imported Upstream version 1.72.0

[platform/upstream/boost.git] / libs / math / doc / html / math_toolkit / tuning.html

diff --git a/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/tuning.html b/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/tuning.html
index f854f26..f3c66d7 100644 (file)
--- a/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/tuning.html
+++ b/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/tuning.html
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 <title>Performance Tuning Macros</title>
 <link rel="stylesheet" href="../math.css" type="text/css">
 <meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.79.1">
-<link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="Math Toolkit 2.10.0">
-<link rel="up" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;20.&#160;Performance">
+<link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="Math Toolkit 2.11.0">
+<link rel="up" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;21.&#160;Performance">
 <link rel="prev" href="multiprecision.html" title="Cost of High-Precision Non-built-in Floating-point">
 <link rel="next" href="comp_compilers.html" title="Comparing Different Compilers">
 </head>
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
       seems not to be such a good idea (method 3 below).
     </p>
 <div class="table">
-<a name="math_toolkit.tuning.table_Polynomial_Method_Comparison_with_Microsoft_Visual_C_version_14_0_on_Windows_x64"></a><p class="title"><b>Table&#160;20.3.&#160;Polynomial Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0
+<a name="math_toolkit.tuning.table_Polynomial_Method_Comparison_with_Microsoft_Visual_C_version_14_0_on_Windows_x64"></a><p class="title"><b>Table&#160;21.3.&#160;Polynomial Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0
       on Windows x64</b></p>
 <div class="table-contents"><table class="table" summary="Polynomial Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0
       on Windows x64">
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@
 </table></div>
 </div>
 <br class="table-break"><div class="table">
-<a name="math_toolkit.tuning.table_Rational_Method_Comparison_with_Microsoft_Visual_C_version_14_0_on_Windows_x64"></a><p class="title"><b>Table&#160;20.4.&#160;Rational Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0 on
+<a name="math_toolkit.tuning.table_Rational_Method_Comparison_with_Microsoft_Visual_C_version_14_0_on_Windows_x64"></a><p class="title"><b>Table&#160;21.4.&#160;Rational Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0 on
       Windows x64</b></p>
 <div class="table-contents"><table class="table" summary="Rational Method Comparison with Microsoft Visual C++ version 14.0 on
       Windows x64">