Imported Upstream version 1.72.0

[platform/upstream/boost.git] / libs / math / doc / html / math_toolkit / perf_over1.html

diff --git a/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/perf_over1.html b/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/perf_over1.html
index 0162134..b8ff080 100644 (file)
--- a/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/perf_over1.html
+++ b/libs/math/doc/html/math_toolkit/perf_over1.html
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 <title>Performance</title>
 <link rel="stylesheet" href="../math.css" type="text/css">
 <meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.79.1">
-<link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="Math Toolkit 2.10.0">
+<link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="Math Toolkit 2.11.0">
 <link rel="up" href="../overview.html" title="Chapter&#160;1.&#160;Overview">
 <link rel="prev" href="threads.html" title="Thread Safety">
 <link rel="next" href="building.html" title="If and How to Build a Boost.Math Library, and its Examples and Tests">
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
       By and large the performance of this library should be acceptable for most
       needs. However, often the library has to make a choice whether to be accurate
       or fast and by default it chooses accuracy over speed. If you would rather
-      have fast rather than fully accurate routines, then refer to the <a class="link" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;20.&#160;Performance">performance
+      have fast rather than fully accurate routines, then refer to the <a class="link" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;21.&#160;Performance">performance
       section</a> for information and examples on how to achieve this.
     </p>
 <p>
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
         </li>
 </ol></div>
 <p>
-      The <a class="link" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;20.&#160;Performance">performance section</a> contains more information
+      The <a class="link" href="../perf.html" title="Chapter&#160;21.&#160;Performance">performance section</a> contains more information
       on the performance of this library, what you can do to fine tune it, and how
       this library compares to some other open source alternatives.
     </p>