#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
+/*
+ * Initialize an rcu_batch structure to empty.
+ */
+static inline void rcu_batch_init(struct rcu_batch *b)
+{
+ b->head = NULL;
+ b->tail = &b->head;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Enqueue a callback onto the tail of the specified rcu_batch structure.
+ */
+static inline void rcu_batch_queue(struct rcu_batch *b, struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ *b->tail = head;
+ b->tail = &head->next;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Is the specified rcu_batch structure empty?
+ */
+static inline bool rcu_batch_empty(struct rcu_batch *b)
+{
+ return b->tail == &b->head;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Remove the callback at the head of the specified rcu_batch structure
+ * and return a pointer to it, or return NULL if the structure is empty.
+ */
+static inline struct rcu_head *rcu_batch_dequeue(struct rcu_batch *b)
+{
+ struct rcu_head *head;
+
+ if (rcu_batch_empty(b))
+ return NULL;
+
+ head = b->head;
+ b->head = head->next;
+ if (b->tail == &head->next)
+ rcu_batch_init(b);
+
+ return head;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Move all callbacks from the rcu_batch structure specified by "from" to
+ * the structure specified by "to".
+ */
+static inline void rcu_batch_move(struct rcu_batch *to, struct rcu_batch *from)
+{
+ if (!rcu_batch_empty(from)) {
+ *to->tail = from->head;
+ to->tail = from->tail;
+ rcu_batch_init(from);
+ }
+}
+
+/* single-thread state-machine */
+static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
+
static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
sp->completed = 0;
- mutex_init(&sp->mutex);
+ spin_lock_init(&sp->queue_lock);
+ sp->running = false;
+ rcu_batch_init(&sp->batch_queue);
+ rcu_batch_init(&sp->batch_check0);
+ rcu_batch_init(&sp->batch_check1);
+ rcu_batch_init(&sp->batch_done);
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sp->work, process_srcu);
sp->per_cpu_ref = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_struct_array);
return sp->per_cpu_ref ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
/*
- * srcu_readers_active_idx -- returns approximate number of readers
- * active on the specified rank of per-CPU counters.
+ * Returns approximate total of the readers' ->seq[] values for the
+ * rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx.
*/
+static unsigned long srcu_readers_seq_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ unsigned long sum = 0;
+ unsigned long t;
-static int srcu_readers_active_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ t = ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->seq[idx]);
+ sum += t;
+ }
+ return sum;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns approximate number of readers active on the specified rank
+ * of the per-CPU ->c[] counters.
+ */
+static unsigned long srcu_readers_active_idx(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
{
int cpu;
- int sum;
+ unsigned long sum = 0;
+ unsigned long t;
- sum = 0;
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- sum += per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[idx];
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ t = ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[idx]);
+ sum += t;
+ }
return sum;
}
+/*
+ * Return true if the number of pre-existing readers is determined to
+ * be stably zero. An example unstable zero can occur if the call
+ * to srcu_readers_active_idx() misses an __srcu_read_lock() increment,
+ * but due to task migration, sees the corresponding __srcu_read_unlock()
+ * decrement. This can happen because srcu_readers_active_idx() takes
+ * time to sum the array, and might in fact be interrupted or preempted
+ * partway through the summation.
+ */
+static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
+{
+ unsigned long seq;
+
+ seq = srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx);
+
+ /*
+ * The following smp_mb() A pairs with the smp_mb() B located in
+ * __srcu_read_lock(). This pairing ensures that if an
+ * __srcu_read_lock() increments its counter after the summation
+ * in srcu_readers_active_idx(), then the corresponding SRCU read-side
+ * critical section will see any changes made prior to the start
+ * of the current SRCU grace period.
+ *
+ * Also, if the above call to srcu_readers_seq_idx() saw the
+ * increment of ->seq[], then the call to srcu_readers_active_idx()
+ * must see the increment of ->c[].
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* A */
+
+ /*
+ * Note that srcu_readers_active_idx() can incorrectly return
+ * zero even though there is a pre-existing reader throughout.
+ * To see this, suppose that task A is in a very long SRCU
+ * read-side critical section that started on CPU 0, and that
+ * no other reader exists, so that the sum of the counters
+ * is equal to one. Then suppose that task B starts executing
+ * srcu_readers_active_idx(), summing up to CPU 1, and then that
+ * task C starts reading on CPU 0, so that its increment is not
+ * summed, but finishes reading on CPU 2, so that its decrement
+ * -is- summed. Then when task B completes its sum, it will
+ * incorrectly get zero, despite the fact that task A has been
+ * in its SRCU read-side critical section the whole time.
+ *
+ * We therefore do a validation step should srcu_readers_active_idx()
+ * return zero.
+ */
+ if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx) != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * The remainder of this function is the validation step.
+ * The following smp_mb() D pairs with the smp_mb() C in
+ * __srcu_read_unlock(). If the __srcu_read_unlock() was seen
+ * by srcu_readers_active_idx() above, then any destructive
+ * operation performed after the grace period will happen after
+ * the corresponding SRCU read-side critical section.
+ *
+ * Note that there can be at most NR_CPUS worth of readers using
+ * the old index, which is not enough to overflow even a 32-bit
+ * integer. (Yes, this does mean that systems having more than
+ * a billion or so CPUs need to be 64-bit systems.) Therefore,
+ * the sum of the ->seq[] counters cannot possibly overflow.
+ * Therefore, the only way that the return values of the two
+ * calls to srcu_readers_seq_idx() can be equal is if there were
+ * no increments of the corresponding rank of ->seq[] counts
+ * in the interim. But the missed-increment scenario laid out
+ * above includes an increment of the ->seq[] counter by
+ * the corresponding __srcu_read_lock(). Therefore, if this
+ * scenario occurs, the return values from the two calls to
+ * srcu_readers_seq_idx() will differ, and thus the validation
+ * step below suffices.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* D */
+
+ return srcu_readers_seq_idx(sp, idx) == seq;
+}
+
/**
* srcu_readers_active - returns approximate number of readers.
* @sp: which srcu_struct to count active readers (holding srcu_read_lock).
*/
static int srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
- return srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, 0) + srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, 1);
+ int cpu;
+ unsigned long sum = 0;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ sum += ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[0]);
+ sum += ACCESS_ONCE(per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, cpu)->c[1]);
+ }
+ return sum;
}
/**
int idx;
preempt_disable();
- idx = sp->completed & 0x1;
- barrier(); /* ensure compiler looks -once- at sp->completed. */
- per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, smp_processor_id())->c[idx]++;
- srcu_barrier(); /* ensure compiler won't misorder critical section. */
+ idx = rcu_dereference_index_check(sp->completed,
+ rcu_read_lock_sched_held()) & 0x1;
+ ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->c[idx]) += 1;
+ smp_mb(); /* B */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
+ ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->seq[idx]) += 1;
preempt_enable();
return idx;
}
void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
{
preempt_disable();
- srcu_barrier(); /* ensure compiler won't misorder critical section. */
- per_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref, smp_processor_id())->c[idx]--;
+ smp_mb(); /* C */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
+ ACCESS_ONCE(this_cpu_ptr(sp->per_cpu_ref)->c[idx]) -= 1;
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
* we repeatedly block for 1-millisecond time periods. This approach
* has done well in testing, so there is no need for a config parameter.
*/
-#define SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY 10
+#define SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY 5
+#define SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_TRYCOUNT 2
+#define SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_EXP_TRYCOUNT 12
/*
- * Helper function for synchronize_srcu() and synchronize_srcu_expedited().
+ * @@@ Wait until all pre-existing readers complete. Such readers
+ * will have used the index specified by "idx".
+ * the caller should ensures the ->completed is not changed while checking
+ * and idx = (->completed & 1) ^ 1
*/
-static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, void (*sync_func)(void))
+static bool try_check_zero(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx, int trycount)
{
- int idx;
-
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_srcu() in same-type SRCU (or RCU) read-side critical section");
-
- idx = sp->completed;
- mutex_lock(&sp->mutex);
+ for (;;) {
+ if (srcu_readers_active_idx_check(sp, idx))
+ return true;
+ if (--trycount <= 0)
+ return false;
+ udelay(SRCU_RETRY_CHECK_DELAY);
+ }
+}
- /*
- * Check to see if someone else did the work for us while we were
- * waiting to acquire the lock. We need -two- advances of
- * the counter, not just one. If there was but one, we might have
- * shown up -after- our helper's first synchronize_sched(), thus
- * having failed to prevent CPU-reordering races with concurrent
- * srcu_read_unlock()s on other CPUs (see comment below). So we
- * either (1) wait for two or (2) supply the second ourselves.
- */
+/*
+ * Increment the ->completed counter so that future SRCU readers will
+ * use the other rank of the ->c[] and ->seq[] arrays. This allows
+ * us to wait for pre-existing readers in a starvation-free manner.
+ */
+static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+{
+ sp->completed++;
+}
- if ((sp->completed - idx) >= 2) {
- mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
- return;
+/*
+ * Enqueue an SRCU callback on the specified srcu_struct structure,
+ * initiating grace-period processing if it is not already running.
+ */
+void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, struct rcu_head *head,
+ void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head))
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ head->next = NULL;
+ head->func = func;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sp->queue_lock, flags);
+ rcu_batch_queue(&sp->batch_queue, head);
+ if (!sp->running) {
+ sp->running = true;
+ queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &sp->work, 0);
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->queue_lock, flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_srcu);
- sync_func(); /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */
+struct rcu_synchronize {
+ struct rcu_head head;
+ struct completion completion;
+};
- /*
- * The preceding synchronize_sched() ensures that any CPU that
- * sees the new value of sp->completed will also see any preceding
- * changes to data structures made by this CPU. This prevents
- * some other CPU from reordering the accesses in its SRCU
- * read-side critical section to precede the corresponding
- * srcu_read_lock() -- ensuring that such references will in
- * fact be protected.
- *
- * So it is now safe to do the flip.
- */
+/*
+ * Awaken the corresponding synchronize_srcu() instance now that a
+ * grace period has elapsed.
+ */
+static void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct rcu_synchronize *rcu;
- idx = sp->completed & 0x1;
- sp->completed++;
+ rcu = container_of(head, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
+ complete(&rcu->completion);
+}
- sync_func(); /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */
+static void srcu_advance_batches(struct srcu_struct *sp, int trycount);
+static void srcu_reschedule(struct srcu_struct *sp);
- /*
- * At this point, because of the preceding synchronize_sched(),
- * all srcu_read_lock() calls using the old counters have completed.
- * Their corresponding critical sections might well be still
- * executing, but the srcu_read_lock() primitives themselves
- * will have finished executing. We initially give readers
- * an arbitrarily chosen 10 microseconds to get out of their
- * SRCU read-side critical sections, then loop waiting 1/HZ
- * seconds per iteration. The 10-microsecond value has done
- * very well in testing.
- */
-
- if (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
- udelay(SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_READER_DELAY);
- while (srcu_readers_active_idx(sp, idx))
- schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
+/*
+ * Helper function for synchronize_srcu() and synchronize_srcu_expedited().
+ */
+static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp, int trycount)
+{
+ struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+ struct rcu_head *head = &rcu.head;
+ bool done = false;
- sync_func(); /* Force memory barrier on all CPUs. */
+ rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map) &&
+ !lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
+ !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
+ !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu() in same-type SRCU (or RCU) read-side critical section");
- /*
- * The preceding synchronize_sched() forces all srcu_read_unlock()
- * primitives that were executing concurrently with the preceding
- * for_each_possible_cpu() loop to have completed by this point.
- * More importantly, it also forces the corresponding SRCU read-side
- * critical sections to have also completed, and the corresponding
- * references to SRCU-protected data items to be dropped.
- *
- * Note:
- *
- * Despite what you might think at first glance, the
- * preceding synchronize_sched() -must- be within the
- * critical section ended by the following mutex_unlock().
- * Otherwise, a task taking the early exit can race
- * with a srcu_read_unlock(), which might have executed
- * just before the preceding srcu_readers_active() check,
- * and whose CPU might have reordered the srcu_read_unlock()
- * with the preceding critical section. In this case, there
- * is nothing preventing the synchronize_sched() task that is
- * taking the early exit from freeing a data structure that
- * is still being referenced (out of order) by the task
- * doing the srcu_read_unlock().
- *
- * Alternatively, the comparison with "2" on the early exit
- * could be changed to "3", but this increases synchronize_srcu()
- * latency for bulk loads. So the current code is preferred.
- */
+ init_completion(&rcu.completion);
+
+ head->next = NULL;
+ head->func = wakeme_after_rcu;
+ spin_lock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ if (!sp->running) {
+ /* steal the processing owner */
+ sp->running = true;
+ rcu_batch_queue(&sp->batch_check0, head);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+
+ srcu_advance_batches(sp, trycount);
+ if (!rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_done)) {
+ BUG_ON(sp->batch_done.head != head);
+ rcu_batch_dequeue(&sp->batch_done);
+ done = true;
+ }
+ /* give the processing owner to work_struct */
+ srcu_reschedule(sp);
+ } else {
+ rcu_batch_queue(&sp->batch_queue, head);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ }
- mutex_unlock(&sp->mutex);
+ if (!done)
+ wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
}
/**
*/
void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
- __synchronize_srcu(sp, synchronize_sched);
+ __synchronize_srcu(sp, SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_TRYCOUNT);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
* synchronize_srcu_expedited - Brute-force SRCU grace period
* @sp: srcu_struct with which to synchronize.
*
- * Wait for an SRCU grace period to elapse, but use a "big hammer"
- * approach to force the grace period to end quickly. This consumes
- * significant time on all CPUs and is unfriendly to real-time workloads,
- * so is thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact,
- * if you are using synchronize_srcu_expedited() in a loop, please
- * restructure your code to batch your updates, and then use a single
- * synchronize_srcu() instead.
+ * Wait for an SRCU grace period to elapse, but be more aggressive about
+ * spinning rather than blocking when waiting.
*
* Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock
- * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. And yes, it is also illegal
- * to call this function from a CPU-hotplug notifier. Failing to observe
- * these restriction will result in deadlock. It is also illegal to call
+ * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier. It is also illegal to call
* synchronize_srcu_expedited() from the corresponding SRCU read-side
* critical section; doing so will result in deadlock. However, it is
* perfectly legal to call synchronize_srcu_expedited() on one srcu_struct
*/
void synchronize_srcu_expedited(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
- __synchronize_srcu(sp, synchronize_sched_expedited);
+ __synchronize_srcu(sp, SYNCHRONIZE_SRCU_EXP_TRYCOUNT);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu_expedited);
/**
+ * srcu_barrier - Wait until all in-flight call_srcu() callbacks complete.
+ */
+void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+{
+ synchronize_srcu(sp);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_barrier);
+
+/**
* srcu_batches_completed - return batches completed.
* @sp: srcu_struct on which to report batch completion.
*
* Report the number of batches, correlated with, but not necessarily
* precisely the same as, the number of grace periods that have elapsed.
*/
-
long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
return sp->completed;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_batches_completed);
+
+#define SRCU_CALLBACK_BATCH 10
+#define SRCU_INTERVAL 1
+
+/*
+ * Move any new SRCU callbacks to the first stage of the SRCU grace
+ * period pipeline.
+ */
+static void srcu_collect_new(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+{
+ if (!rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_queue)) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ rcu_batch_move(&sp->batch_check0, &sp->batch_queue);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Core SRCU state machine. Advance callbacks from ->batch_check0 to
+ * ->batch_check1 and then to ->batch_done as readers drain.
+ */
+static void srcu_advance_batches(struct srcu_struct *sp, int trycount)
+{
+ int idx = 1 ^ (sp->completed & 1);
+
+ /*
+ * Because readers might be delayed for an extended period after
+ * fetching ->completed for their index, at any point in time there
+ * might well be readers using both idx=0 and idx=1. We therefore
+ * need to wait for readers to clear from both index values before
+ * invoking a callback.
+ */
+
+ if (rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check0) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check1))
+ return; /* no callbacks need to be advanced */
+
+ if (!try_check_zero(sp, idx, trycount))
+ return; /* failed to advance, will try after SRCU_INTERVAL */
+
+ /*
+ * The callbacks in ->batch_check1 have already done with their
+ * first zero check and flip back when they were enqueued on
+ * ->batch_check0 in a previous invocation of srcu_advance_batches().
+ * (Presumably try_check_zero() returned false during that
+ * invocation, leaving the callbacks stranded on ->batch_check1.)
+ * They are therefore ready to invoke, so move them to ->batch_done.
+ */
+ rcu_batch_move(&sp->batch_done, &sp->batch_check1);
+
+ if (rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check0))
+ return; /* no callbacks need to be advanced */
+ srcu_flip(sp);
+
+ /*
+ * The callbacks in ->batch_check0 just finished their
+ * first check zero and flip, so move them to ->batch_check1
+ * for future checking on the other idx.
+ */
+ rcu_batch_move(&sp->batch_check1, &sp->batch_check0);
+
+ /*
+ * SRCU read-side critical sections are normally short, so check
+ * at least twice in quick succession after a flip.
+ */
+ trycount = trycount < 2 ? 2 : trycount;
+ if (!try_check_zero(sp, idx^1, trycount))
+ return; /* failed to advance, will try after SRCU_INTERVAL */
+
+ /*
+ * The callbacks in ->batch_check1 have now waited for all
+ * pre-existing readers using both idx values. They are therefore
+ * ready to invoke, so move them to ->batch_done.
+ */
+ rcu_batch_move(&sp->batch_done, &sp->batch_check1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Invoke a limited number of SRCU callbacks that have passed through
+ * their grace period. If there are more to do, SRCU will reschedule
+ * the workqueue.
+ */
+static void srcu_invoke_callbacks(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct rcu_head *head;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < SRCU_CALLBACK_BATCH; i++) {
+ head = rcu_batch_dequeue(&sp->batch_done);
+ if (!head)
+ break;
+ local_bh_disable();
+ head->func(head);
+ local_bh_enable();
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * Finished one round of SRCU grace period. Start another if there are
+ * more SRCU callbacks queued, otherwise put SRCU into not-running state.
+ */
+static void srcu_reschedule(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+{
+ bool pending = true;
+
+ if (rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_done) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check1) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check0) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_queue)) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ if (rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_done) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check1) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_check0) &&
+ rcu_batch_empty(&sp->batch_queue)) {
+ sp->running = false;
+ pending = false;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sp->queue_lock);
+ }
+
+ if (pending)
+ queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &sp->work, SRCU_INTERVAL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is the work-queue function that handles SRCU grace periods.
+ */
+static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct srcu_struct *sp;
+
+ sp = container_of(work, struct srcu_struct, work.work);
+
+ srcu_collect_new(sp);
+ srcu_advance_batches(sp, 1);
+ srcu_invoke_callbacks(sp);
+ srcu_reschedule(sp);
+}
projects / platform / adaptation / renesas_rcar / renesas_kernel.git / blobdiff