dcache: move the DCACHE_OP_COMPARE case out of the __d_lookup_rcu loop
[platform/kernel/linux-starfive.git] / fs / dcache.c
index c5dc32a..bb0c4d0 100644 (file)
@@ -2270,6 +2270,48 @@ bool d_same_name(const struct dentry *dentry, const struct dentry *parent,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(d_same_name);
 
+/*
+ * This is __d_lookup_rcu() when the parent dentry has
+ * DCACHE_OP_COMPARE, which makes things much nastier.
+ */
+static noinline struct dentry *__d_lookup_rcu_op_compare(
+       const struct dentry *parent,
+       const struct qstr *name,
+       unsigned *seqp)
+{
+       u64 hashlen = name->hash_len;
+       struct hlist_bl_head *b = d_hash(hashlen_hash(hashlen));
+       struct hlist_bl_node *node;
+       struct dentry *dentry;
+
+       hlist_bl_for_each_entry_rcu(dentry, node, b, d_hash) {
+               int tlen;
+               const char *tname;
+               unsigned seq;
+
+seqretry:
+               seq = raw_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
+               if (dentry->d_parent != parent)
+                       continue;
+               if (d_unhashed(dentry))
+                       continue;
+               if (dentry->d_name.hash != hashlen_hash(hashlen))
+                       continue;
+               tlen = dentry->d_name.len;
+               tname = dentry->d_name.name;
+               /* we want a consistent (name,len) pair */
+               if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, seq)) {
+                       cpu_relax();
+                       goto seqretry;
+               }
+               if (parent->d_op->d_compare(dentry, tlen, tname, name) != 0)
+                       continue;
+               *seqp = seq;
+               return dentry;
+       }
+       return NULL;
+}
+
 /**
  * __d_lookup_rcu - search for a dentry (racy, store-free)
  * @parent: parent dentry
@@ -2316,6 +2358,9 @@ struct dentry *__d_lookup_rcu(const struct dentry *parent,
         * Keep the two functions in sync.
         */
 
+       if (unlikely(parent->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_COMPARE))
+               return __d_lookup_rcu_op_compare(parent, name, seqp);
+
        /*
         * The hash list is protected using RCU.
         *
@@ -2332,7 +2377,6 @@ struct dentry *__d_lookup_rcu(const struct dentry *parent,
        hlist_bl_for_each_entry_rcu(dentry, node, b, d_hash) {
                unsigned seq;
 
-seqretry:
                /*
                 * The dentry sequence count protects us from concurrent
                 * renames, and thus protects parent and name fields.
@@ -2355,28 +2399,10 @@ seqretry:
                        continue;
                if (d_unhashed(dentry))
                        continue;
-
-               if (unlikely(parent->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_COMPARE)) {
-                       int tlen;
-                       const char *tname;
-                       if (dentry->d_name.hash != hashlen_hash(hashlen))
-                               continue;
-                       tlen = dentry->d_name.len;
-                       tname = dentry->d_name.name;
-                       /* we want a consistent (name,len) pair */
-                       if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, seq)) {
-                               cpu_relax();
-                               goto seqretry;
-                       }
-                       if (parent->d_op->d_compare(dentry,
-                                                   tlen, tname, name) != 0)
-                               continue;
-               } else {
-                       if (dentry->d_name.hash_len != hashlen)
-                               continue;
-                       if (dentry_cmp(dentry, str, hashlen_len(hashlen)) != 0)
-                               continue;
-               }
+               if (dentry->d_name.hash_len != hashlen)
+                       continue;
+               if (dentry_cmp(dentry, str, hashlen_len(hashlen)) != 0)
+                       continue;
                *seqp = seq;
                return dentry;
        }