D-BUS is a simple IPC library based on messages.
+
+See also the file HACKING for notes of interest to developers working on D-BUS.
+
+See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus/ for lots of documentation,
+mailing lists, etc.
+
+Note
+===
+
+A core concept of the D-BUS implementation is that "libdbus" is
+intended to be a low-level API, similar to Xlib. Most programmers are
+intended to use the bindings to GLib, Qt, Python, Mono, Java, or
+whatever. These bindings have varying levels of completeness.
+
+Configuration flags
+===
+
+These are the dbus-specific configuration flags that can be given to
+the ./configure program.
+
+ --enable-qt enable Qt-friendly client library
+ --enable-glib enable GLib-friendly client library
+ --enable-mono enable mono bindings
+ --enable-mono-docs build mono documentation (requires monodoc)
+ --enable-tests enable unit test code
+ --enable-ansi enable -ansi -pedantic gcc flags
+ --enable-verbose-mode support verbose debug mode
+ --enable-asserts include assertion checks
+ --enable-checks include sanity checks on public API
+ --enable-docs build documentation (requires Doxygen and jade)
+ --enable-gcov compile with coverage profiling instrumentation (gcc only)
+ --enable-python build python bindings (reqires Pyrex >= 0.9)
+
+ --with-xml=libxml/expat XML library to use
+ --with-init-scripts=redhat Style of init scripts to install
+ --with-session-socket-dir=dirname Where to put sockets for the per-login-session message bus
+ --with-test-socket-dir=dirname Where to put sockets for make check
+ --with-system-pid-file=pidfile PID file for systemwide daemon
+ --with-system-socket=filename UNIX domain socket for systemwide daemon
+
+
+API/ABI Policy
+===
+
+D-BUS API/ABI and protocol necessarily remain in flux until we are
+sure it will meet the various needs it's intended to meet. This means
+we need to see some significant sample usage in the contexts of GNOME,
+KDE, desktop applications, and systemwide uses such as print queue
+monitoring, hotplug events, or whatever. We need the flexibility to
+incorporate feedback from this sample usage.
+
+Once we feel confident in the protocol and the API, we will release a
+version 1.0. At that point, the intent is:
+
+ - The protocol will never be broken again; any message bus should
+ work with any client forever. However, extensions are possible
+ where the protocol is extensible.
+
+ - If the library API is modified incompatibly, we will rename it
+ as in http://ometer.com/parallel.html - in other words,
+ it will always be possible to compile against and use the older
+ API, and apps will always get the API they expect.
+
+Until 1.0 is released, feedback that requires API changes may be
+incorporated into D-BUS. This may break the API, the ABI, the
+protocol, or all three.
+
+To avoid a huge soname, the plan is to increment the soname only
+between official stable releases, not with every development snapshot.
+Versions numbered 0.x are considered development snapshots.
+
+Until 1.0 is released, you have to define -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE
+just as a safety check to be sure everyone is aware of this API/ABI
+policy and has the right expectations.
+
+We do need people to test the APIs, so please do use the development
+snapshots of D-BUS. They are intended to work and we do actively
+address bugs.
+
+However, if you're shipping a commercial binary-only application that
+needs to keep running on M future versions of N operating systems, you
+might want to include your own copy of D-BUS rather than relying on
+the installed copy, for example.