data). Avoiding heuristics is also important for security reasons;
if it looks funny, ignore it (or exit, or disconnect).
+Development
+===
+
+D-Bus uses Git as its version control system. The main repository is
+hosted at git.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus. To clone D-Bus, execute the
+following command:
+
+ git clone git://git.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus
+OR
+ git clone git.freedesktop.org:dbus/dbus
+
+The latter form is the one that allows pushing, but it also requires
+an SSH account on the server. The former form allows anonymous
+checkouts.
+
+D-Bus development happens in two branches in parallel: the current
+stable branch, with an even minor number (like 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4), and
+the next development branch, with the next odd number.
+
+The stable branch is named after the version number itself (dbus-1.2,
+dbus-1.4), whereas the development branch is simply known as "master".
+
+When making a change to D-Bus, do the following:
+
+ - check out the earliest branch of D-Bus that makes sense to have
+ your change in. If it's a bugfix, it's normally the current stable
+ branch; if it's a feature, it's normally the "master" branch. If
+ you have an important security fix, you may want to apply to older
+ branches too.
+
+ - for large changes:
+ if you're developing a new, large feature, it's recommended
+ to create a new branch and do your development there. Publish
+ your branch at a suitable place and ask others to help you
+ develop and test it. Once your feature is considered finalised,
+ you may merge it into the "master" branch.
+
+- for small changes:
+ . make your change to the source code
+ . execute tests to guarantee that you're not introducing a
+ regression. For that, execute: make check
+ (if possible, add a new test to check the fix you're
+ introducing)
+ . commit your change using "git commit"
+ in the commit message, write a short sentence describing what
+ you did in the first line. Then write a longer description in
+ the next paragraph(s).
+ . repeat the previous steps if necessary to have multiple commits
+
+ - extract your patches and send to the D-Bus mailing list for
+ review or post them to the D-Bus Bugzilla, attaching them to a bug
+ report. To extract the patches, execute:
+ git format-patch origin/master
+
+ - once your code has been reviewed, you may push it to the Git
+ server:
+ git push origin my-branch:remote
+ OR
+ git push origin dbus-X.Y
+ OR
+ git push origin master
+ (consult the Git manual to know which command applies)
+
+ - (Optional) if you've not worked on "master", merge your changes to
+ that branch. If you've worked on an earlier branch than the current
+ stable, merge your changes upwards towards the stable branch, then
+ from there into "master".
+
+ . execute: git checkout master
+ . ensure that you have the latest "master" from the server, update
+ if you don't
+ . execute: git merge dbus-X.Y
+ . if you have any conflicts, resolve them, git add the conflicted
+ files and then git commit
+ . push the "master" branch to the server as well
+
+ Executing this merge is recommended, but not necessary for all
+ changes. You should do this step if your bugfix is critical for the
+ development in "master", or if you suspect that conflicts will arise
+ (you're usually the best person to resolve conflicts introduced by
+ your own code), or if it has been too long since the last merge.
+
+
Making a release
===
To make a release of D-Bus, do the following:
- - check out a fresh copy from CVS
+ - check out a fresh copy from Git
- verify that the libtool versioning/library soname is
changed if it needs to be, or not changed if not
- if make distcheck fails, fix it.
- - once distcheck succeeds, "git-commit -a". This is the version
+ - once distcheck succeeds, "git commit -a". This is the version
of the tree that corresponds exactly to the released tarball.
- - tag the tree with "git-tag -s -m 'Released X.Y.Z' dbus-X.Y.Z"
+ - tag the tree with "git tag -s -m 'Released X.Y.Z' dbus-X.Y.Z"
where X.Y.Z is the version of the release. If you can't sign
- then simply created an unannotated tag: "git-tag dbus-X.Y.Z".
+ then simply created an unsigned annotated tag:
+ "git tag -a -m 'Released X.Y.Z' dbus-X.Y.Z".
- bump the version number up in configure.in, and commit
it. Make sure you do this *after* tagging the previous
release! The idea is that git has a newer version number
than anything released.
- - push your changes to the central repository
+ - merge the branch you've released to the chronologically-later
+ branch (usually "master"). You'll probably have to fix a merge
+ conflict in configure.in (the version number).
- - scp your tarball to freedesktop.org server and copy it
- to /srv/dbus.freedesktop.org/www/releases/dbus. This should
- be possible if you're in group "dbus"
+ - push your changes and the tag to the central repository with
+ git push origin master dbus-X.Y dbus-X.Y.Z
+
+ - scp your tarball to freedesktop.org server and copy it to
+ dbus.freedesktop.org:/srv/dbus.freedesktop.org/www/releases/dbus/dbus-X.Y.Z.tar.gz.
+ This should be possible if you're in group "dbus"
+
+ - Update the online documentation with `make -C doc maintainer-upload-docs`.
- update the wiki page http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/dbus by
adding the new release under the Download heading. Then, cut the
The branch name should be dbus-X.Y-branch which is a branch that has
releases versioned X.Y.Z
-To branch, add a tag to the common ancestor:
- git tag dbus-X.Y-branchpoint
-then create the branch:
- git branch dbus-X.Y-branch
+To branch:
+ git branch dbus-X.Y-branch
+and upload the branch tag to the server:
+ git-push origin dbus-X.Y-branch
-Note that dbus-X.Y-branchpoint may not tag the same revision as the
-dbus-X.Y.0 release, since we may not branch immediately.
+To develop in this branch:
+ git-checkout dbus-X.Y-branch
Environment variables
===
A test that tries to break the message loader by passing it randomly
created invalid messages.
+test/name-test/*
+This is a suite of programs which are run with a temporary session bus.
+If your test involves multiple processes communicating, your best bet
+is to add a test in here.
+
"make check" runs all the deterministic test programs (i.e. not break-loader).
"make check-coverage" is available if you configure with --enable-gcov and
- regardless of reviews, to commit a patch:
- make check must pass
- the test suite must be extended to cover the new code
- as much as reasonably feasible
+ as much as reasonably feasible (see Tests above)
- the patch has to follow the portability, security, and
style guidelines
- the patch should as much as reasonable do one thing,
No reviewer should approve a patch without these attributes, and
failure on these points is grounds for reverting the patch.
-The reviewer group that can approve patches: Havoc Pennington, Michael
-Meeks, Alex Larsson, Zack Rusin, Joe Shaw, Mikael Hallendal, Richard
-Hult, Owen Fraser-Green, Olivier Andrieu, Colin Walters, Thiago
-Macieira, John Palmieri.
+The reviewer group that can approve patches:
+
+Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.net>
+Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com>
+Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
+Zack Rusin <zack@kde.org>
+Joe Shaw <joe@assbarn.com>
+Mikael Hallendal <micke@imendio.com>
+Richard Hult <richard@imendio.com>
+Owen Fraser-Green <owen@discobabe.net>
+Olivier Andrieu <oliv__a@users.sourceforge.net>
+Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
+Thiago Macieira <thiago@kde.org>
+John Palmieri <johnp@redhat.com>
+Scott James Remnant <scott@netsplit.com>
+Will Thompson <will.thompson@collabora.co.uk>
+Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>