Open Group's hdrchk
--------------------
+===================
The hdrchk test suite is available from the Open Group at
ftp://ftp.rdg.opengroup.org/pub/unsupported/stdtools/hdrchk/
-I've last run the suite on 1998-07-08 on a Linux/ix86 system with the
+I've last run the suite on 2000-08-13 on a Linux/ix86 system with the
following results [*]:
FIPS No reported problems
XPG3 No reported problems
- XPG4 The wide character I/O stuff is missing in glibc.
+ XPG4 No reported problems
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-*** Starting wchar.h
-Missing: extern wint_t fgetwc();
-Missing: extern wchar_t *fgetws();
-Missing: extern wint_t fputwc();
-Missing: extern int fputws();
-Missing: extern wint_t getwc();
-Missing: extern wint_t getwchar();
-Missing: extern wint_t putwc();
-Missing: extern wchar_t putwchar();
-Missing: extern wint_t ungetwc();
-Missing: extern size_t wcsftime();
-*** Completed wchar.h
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
- Beside this a problem in stdio.h is reported but
- this is only because the scripts don't understand
- the sometimes complex constructs in the header.
-
- POSIX96 Same as UNIX98 [see below].
- UNIX98 Quite a lot of problems, almost all due to limitations
- of the Linux kernel (2.1.108):
+ POSIX96 Same as for UNIX98 (see below).
+ UNIX98 The message queue implementation is missing:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-*** Starting mqueue.h
-Missing #include file: mqueue.h
-*** Completed mqueue.h
-*** Starting semaphore.h
-Missing: #define SEM_FAILED (-1)
-Missing: extern int sem_close();
-Missing: extern sem_t *sem_open();
-Missing: extern int sem_unlink();
-*** Completed semaphore.h
-*** Starting signal.h
-Missing: #define SIGSYS (-1)
-*** Completed signal.h
-*** Starting sys/mman.h
-Missing: extern int shm_open();
-Missing: extern int shm_unlink();
-*** Completed sys/mman.h
-*** Starting sys/stat.h
-Missing: #define S_TYPEISMQ (-1)
-Missing: #define S_TYPEISSEM (-1)
-Missing: #define S_TYPEISSHM (-1)
-*** Completed sys/stat.h
-*** Starting sys/types.h
-Missing: typedef <type> clockid_t;
-Missing: typedef <type> timer_t;
-*** Completed sys/types.h
-*** Starting time.h
-Missing: #define CLOCK_REALTIME (-1)
-Missing: #define TIMER_ABSTIME (-1)
-Missing: extern int clock_getres();
-Missing: extern int clock_gettime();
-Missing: extern int clock_settime();
-Missing: struct itimerspec { <members> };
-Missing: extern int timer_create();
-Missing: extern int timer_delete();
-Missing: extern int timer_getoverrun();
-Missing: extern int timer_gettime();
-Missing: extern int timer_settime();
-*** Completed time.h
-*** Starting unistd.h
-Missing: #define _POSIX_MESSAGE_PASSING (-1)
-Missing: #define _POSIX_SEMAPHORES (-1)
-Missing: #define _POSIX_SHARED_MEMORY_OBJECTS (-1)
-Missing: #define _POSIX_TIMERS (-1)
-*** Completed unistd.h
-*** Starting wchar.h
-Missing: extern wint_t fgetwc();
-Missing: extern wchar_t *fgetws();
-Missing: extern wint_t fputwc();
-Missing: extern int fputws();
-Missing: extern int fwide();
-Missing: extern int fwprintf();
-Missing: extern int fwscanf();
-Missing: extern wint_t getwc();
-Missing: extern wint_t getwchar();
-Missing: extern wint_t putwc();
-Missing: extern wchar_t putwchar();
-Missing: extern int swprintf();
-Missing: extern int swscanf();
-Missing: extern wint_t ungetwc();
-Missing: extern int vfwprintf();
-Missing: extern int vswprintf();
-Missing: extern int vwprintf();
-Missing: extern size_t wcsftime();
-Missing: extern wchar_t *wcswcs();
-Missing: extern int wprintf();
-Missing: extern int wscanf();
-*** Completed wchar.h
+/****** <mqueue.h> - Missing include file ******/
+/****** Start of Definitions for file mqueue.h ******/
+extern int mq_close();
+extern int mq_getattr();
+extern int mq_notify();
+extern mqd_t mq_open();
+extern ssize_t mq_receive();
+extern int mq_send();
+extern int mq_setattr();
+extern int mq_unlink();
+typedef <type> mqd_t;
+struct mq_attr { <members> };
+struct sigevent { <members> };
+/****** End of Definitions for file mqueue.h ******/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Only the `wchar.h' problems result from glibc
- defficiencies since we still don't support wide
- character I/O.
-
[*] Since the scripts are not clever enough for the way gcc handles
include files (namely, putting some of them in gcc-local directory) I
copied over the iso646.h, float.h, and stddef.h headers and ignored the
problems resulting from the splitted limits.h file).
+
+
+Technical C standards conformance issues in glibc
+=================================================
+
+If you compile programs against glibc with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined
+(as, for example, by gcc -ansi, gcc -std=c89, gcc -std=iso1990:199409
+or gcc -std=c99), and use only the headers specified by the version of
+the C standard chosen, glibc will attempt to conform to that version
+of the C standard (as indicated by __STDC_VERSION__):
+
+GCC options Standard version
+-ansi ISO/IEC 9899:1990
+-std=c89 ISO/IEC 9899:1990
+-std=iso9899:199409 ISO/IEC 9899:1990 as amended by Amd.1:1995 *
+-std=c99 ISO/IEC 9899:1999
+
+* glibc does not support this standard version.
+
+(Note that -std=c99 is not available in GCC 2.95.2, and that no
+version of GCC presently existing implements the full C99 standard.)
+
+You may then define additional feature test macros to enable the
+features from other standards, and use the headers defined in those
+standards (for example, defining _POSIX_C_SOURCE to be 199506L to
+enable features from ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996).
+
+There are some technical ways in which glibc is known not to conform
+to the supported versions of the C standard, as detailed below. Some
+of these relate to defects in the standard that are expected to be
+fixed, or to compiler limitations.
+
+
+Defects in the C99 standard
+===========================
+
+The definition of macros such as INT8_C in <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h>
+is not implementable (Defect Report #209); this is expected to be
+fixed in a Technical Corrigendum to make the macros yield a constant
+expression of the promoted type (for example, int rather than char)
+rather than needing to be able to represent constants of type char.
+glibc follows this corrected version.
+
+Several of the <fenv.h> functions are specified to return void, but
+Defect Report #202 points out that under some circumstances they may
+need to return an error status. They are expected to be corrected to
+return int; glibc follows this corrected specification.
+
+
+Implementation of library functions
+===================================
+
+The implementation of some library functions does not fully follow the
+standard specification:
+
+C99 added additional forms of floating point constants (hexadecimal
+constants, NaNs and infinities) to be recognised by strtod() and
+scanf(). The effect is to change the behavior of some strictly
+conforming C90 programs; glibc implements the C99 versions only
+irrespective of the standard version selected.
+
+C99 added %a as another scanf format specifier for floating point
+values. This conflicts with the glibc extension where %as, %a[ and
+%aS mean to allocate the string for the data read. A strictly
+conforming C99 program using %as, %a[ or %aS in a scanf format string
+will misbehave under glibc.
+
+
+Compiler limitations
+====================
+
+The macros __STDC_IEC_559__, __STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__ and
+__STDC_ISO_10646__ are properly supposed to be defined by the
+compiler, and to be constant throughout the translation unit (before
+and after any library headers are included). However, they mainly
+relate to library features, and the necessary magic has yet to be
+implemented for GCC to predefine them to the correct values for the
+library in use, so glibc defines them in <features.h>. Programs that
+test them before including any standard headers may misbehave.
+
+GCC doesn't support the optional imaginary types. Nor does it
+understand the keyword _Complex before GCC 3.0. This has the
+corresponding impact on the relevant headers.
+
+glibc's use of extern inline conflicts with C99: in C99, extern inline
+means that an external definition is generated as well as possibly an
+inline definition, but in GCC it means that no external definition is
+generated. When GCC's C99 mode implements C99 inline semantics, this
+will break the uses of extern inline in glibc's headers. (Actually,
+glibc uses `extern __inline', which is beyond the scope of the
+standard, but it would clearly be very confusing for `__inline' and
+plain `inline' to have different meanings in C99 mode.)
+
+glibc's <tgmath.h> implementation is arcane but thought to work
+correctly; a clean and comprehensible version requires compiler
+builtins.
+
+For most of the headers required of freestanding implementations,
+glibc relies on GCC to provide correct versions. (At present, glibc
+provides <stdint.h>, and GCC doesn't.) GCC's <float.h> is missing
+FLT_EVAL_METHOD and DECIMAL_DIG.
+
+Implementing MATH_ERRNO, MATH_ERREXCEPT and math_errhandling in
+<math.h> needs compiler support: see
+
+http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00008.html
+http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00014.html
+http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00015.html
+
+
+Issues with headers
+===================
+
+There are various technical issues with the definitions contained in
+glibc's headers, listed below. The list below assumes current CVS GCC
+as of 2001-01-10, and relates to i686-linux; older GCC may lead to
+more problems in the headers.
+
+Note that the _t suffix is reserved by POSIX, but not by pure ISO C.
+Also, the Single Unix Specification generally requires more types to
+be included in headers (if _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined appropriately)
+than ISO C permits.
+
+<ctype.h> should not declare size_t.
+
+<inttypes.h> should not declare wchar_t.
+
+<signal.h> should not declare size_t.
+
+<stdint.h> should not declare wchar_t.
+
+<stdio.h> should not declare or use wchar_t or wint_t.
+
+<wchar.h> does not support AMD1; to support it, the functions
+fwprintf, fwscanf, wprintf, wscanf, swprintf, swscanf, vfwprintf,
+vwprintf, vswprintf and fwide would need to be declared when
+__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199409L and not just for C99.
+
+<wctype.h> should not declare size_t.