+
+2. Bug fixing procedure
+
+2.1 What happens on first filing
+
+ When a new issue is posted in the issue tracker or on the mailing list, the
+ team of developers first need to see the report. Maybe they took the day
+ off, maybe they're off in the woods hunting. Have patience. Allow at least a
+ few days before expecting someone to have responded.
+
+ In the issue tracker you can expect that some labels will be set on the
+ issue to help categorize it.
+
+2.2 First response
+
+ If your issue/bug report wasn't perfect at once (and few are), chances are
+ that someone will ask follow-up questions. Which version did you use? Which
+ options did you use? How often does the problem occur? How can we reproduce
+ this problem? Which protocols does it involve? Or perhaps much more specific
+ and deep diving questions. It all depends on your specific issue.
+
+ You should then respond to these follow-up questions and provide more info
+ about the problem, so that we can help you figure it out. Or maybe you can
+ help us figure it out. An active back-and-forth communication is important
+ and the key for finding a cure and landing a fix.
+
+2.3 Not reproducible
+
+ For problems that we can't reproduce and can't understand even after having
+ gotten all the info we need and having studied the source code over again,
+ are really hard to solve so then we may require further work from you who
+ actually see or experience the problem.
+
+2.4 Unresponsive
+
+ If the problem haven't been understood or reproduced, and there's nobody
+ responding to follow-up questions or questions asking for clarifications or
+ for discussing possible ways to move forward with the task, we take that as
+ a strong suggestion that the bug is not important.
+
+ Unimportant issues will be closed as inactive sooner or later as they can't
+ be fixed. The inactivity period (waiting for responses) should not be
+ shorter than two weeks but may extend months.
+
+2.5 Lack of time/interest
+
+ Bugs that are filed and are understood can unfortunately end up in the
+ "nobody cares enough about it to work on it" category. Such bugs are
+ perfectly valid problems that *should* get fixed but apparently aren't. We
+ try to mark such bugs as "KNOWN_BUGS material" after a time of inactivity
+ and if no activity is noticed after yet some time those bugs are added to
+ KNOWN_BUGS and are closed in the issue tracker.
+
+2.6 KNOWN_BUGS
+
+ This is a list of known bugs. Bugs we know exist and that have been pointed
+ out but that haven't yet been fixed. The reasons for why they haven't been
+ fixed can involve anything really, but the primary reason is that nobody has
+ considered these problems to be important enough to spend the necesary time
+ and effort to have them fixed.
+
+ The KNOWN_BUGS are always up for grabs and we will always love the ones who
+ bring one of them back to live and offers solutions to them.
+
+ The KNOWN_BUGS document has a sibling document known as TODO.
+
+2.7 TODO
+
+ Issues that are filed or reported that aren't really bugs but more missing
+ features or ideas for future improvements and so on are marked as
+ 'enhancement' or 'feature-request' and will be added to the TODO document
+ instead and the issue is closed. We don't keep TODO items in the issue
+ tracker.
+
+ The TODO document is full of ideas and suggestions of what we can add or fix
+ one day. You're always encouraged and free to grab one of those items and
+ take up a discussion with the curl development team on how that could be
+ implemented or provided in the project so that you can work on ticking it
+ odd that document.
+
+ If the issue is rather a bug and not a missing feature or functionality, it
+ is listed in KNOWN_BUGS instead.
+
+2.8 Closing off stalled bugs
+
+ The issue and pull request trackers on https://github.com/curl/curl will
+ only hold "active" entries (using a non-precise defintion of what active
+ actually is, but they're at least not completely dead). Those that are
+ abandonded or in other ways dormant will be closed and sometimes added to
+ TODO and KNOWN_BUGS instead.
+
+ This way, we only have "active" issues open on github. Irrelevant issues and
+ pull requests will not distract developes or casual visitors.