+E14) Why does quoting the pattern argument to the regular expression matching
+ conditional operator (=~) cause regexp matching to stop working?
+
+In versions of bash prior to bash-3.2, the effect of quoting the regular
+expression argument to the [[ command's =~ operator was not specified.
+The practical effect was that double-quoting the pattern argument required
+backslashes to quote special pattern characters, which interfered with the
+backslash processing performed by double-quoted word expansion and was
+inconsistent with how the == shell pattern matching operator treated
+quoted characters.
+
+In bash-3.2, the shell was changed to internally quote characters in single-
+and double-quoted string arguments to the =~ operator, which suppresses the
+special meaning of the characters special to regular expression processing
+(`.', `[', `\', `(', `), `*', `+', `?', `{', `|', `^', and `$') and forces
+them to be matched literally. This is consistent with how the `==' pattern
+matching operator treats quoted portions of its pattern argument.
+
+Since the treatment of quoted string arguments was changed, several issues
+have arisen, chief among them the problem of white space in pattern arguments
+and the differing treatment of quoted strings between bash-3.1 and bash-3.2.
+Both problems may be solved by using a shell variable to hold the pattern.
+Since word splitting is not performed when expanding shell variables in all
+operands of the [[ command, this allows users to quote patterns as they wish
+when assigning the variable, then expand the values to a single string that
+may contain whitespace. The first problem may be solved by using backslashes
+or any other quoting mechanism to escape the white space in the patterns.
+