.TH PCRECOMPAT 3 .SH NAME PCRE - Perl-compatible regular expressions .SH "DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PCRE AND PERL" .rs .sp This document describes the differences in the ways that PCRE and Perl handle regular expressions. The differences described here are with respect to Perl versions 5.10 and above. .P 1. PCRE has only a subset of Perl's UTF-8 and Unicode support. Details of what it does have are given in the .\" HTML .\" section on UTF-8 support .\" in the main .\" HREF \fBpcre\fP .\" page. .P 2. PCRE does not allow repeat quantifiers on lookahead assertions. Perl permits them, but they do not mean what you might think. For example, (?!a){3} does not assert that the next three characters are not "a". It just asserts that the next character is not "a" three times. .P 3. Capturing subpatterns that occur inside negative lookahead assertions are counted, but their entries in the offsets vector are never set. Perl sets its numerical variables from any such patterns that are matched before the assertion fails to match something (thereby succeeding), but only if the negative lookahead assertion contains just one branch. .P 4. Though binary zero characters are supported in the subject string, they are not allowed in a pattern string because it is passed as a normal C string, terminated by zero. The escape sequence \e0 can be used in the pattern to represent a binary zero. .P 5. The following Perl escape sequences are not supported: \el, \eu, \eL, \eU, and \eN. In fact these are implemented by Perl's general string-handling and are not part of its pattern matching engine. If any of these are encountered by PCRE, an error is generated. .P 6. The Perl escape sequences \ep, \eP, and \eX are supported only if PCRE is built with Unicode character property support. The properties that can be tested with \ep and \eP are limited to the general category properties such as Lu and Nd, script names such as Greek or Han, and the derived properties Any and L&. PCRE does support the Cs (surrogate) property, which Perl does not; the Perl documentation says "Because Perl hides the need for the user to understand the internal representation of Unicode characters, there is no need to implement the somewhat messy concept of surrogates." .P 7. PCRE does support the \eQ...\eE escape for quoting substrings. Characters in between are treated as literals. This is slightly different from Perl in that $ and @ are also handled as literals inside the quotes. In Perl, they cause variable interpolation (but of course PCRE does not have variables). Note the following examples: .sp Pattern PCRE matches Perl matches .sp .\" JOIN \eQabc$xyz\eE abc$xyz abc followed by the contents of $xyz \eQabc\e$xyz\eE abc\e$xyz abc\e$xyz \eQabc\eE\e$\eQxyz\eE abc$xyz abc$xyz .sp The \eQ...\eE sequence is recognized both inside and outside character classes. .P 8. Fairly obviously, PCRE does not support the (?{code}) and (??{code}) constructions. However, there is support for recursive patterns. This is not available in Perl 5.8, but it is in Perl 5.10. Also, the PCRE "callout" feature allows an external function to be called during pattern matching. See the .\" HREF \fBpcrecallout\fP .\" documentation for details. .P 9. Subpatterns that are called recursively or as "subroutines" are always treated as atomic groups in PCRE. This is like Python, but unlike Perl. There is a discussion of an example that explains this in more detail in the .\" HTML .\" section on recursion differences from Perl .\" in the .\" HREF \fBpcrepattern\fP .\" page. .P 10. There are some differences that are concerned with the settings of captured strings when part of a pattern is repeated. For example, matching "aba" against the pattern /^(a(b)?)+$/ in Perl leaves $2 unset, but in PCRE it is set to "b". .P 11. PCRE's handling of duplicate subpattern numbers and duplicate subpattern names is not as general as Perl's. This is a consequence of the fact the PCRE works internally just with numbers, using an external table to translate between numbers and names. In particular, a pattern such as (?|(?A)|(?