1 # Copyright 2002, 2004, 2007-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
3 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
6 # (at your option) any later version.
8 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
11 # GNU General Public License for more details.
13 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
16 # This file is part of the gdb testsuite
18 # Looking up methods by name, in programs with multiple compilation units.
20 # ====== PLEASE BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN CHANGING THIS TEST. =====
22 # The bug we're testing for (circa October 2002) is very sensitive to
23 # various conditions that are hard to control directly in the test
24 # suite. If you change the test, please revert this change, and make
25 # sure the test still fails:
27 # 2002-08-29 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
29 # * symtab.c (lookup_symbol_aux): In the cases where we find a
30 # minimal symbol of an appropriate name and use its address to
31 # select a symtab to read and search, use `name' (as passed to us)
32 # as the demangled name when searching the symtab's global and
33 # static blocks, not the minsym's name.
35 # The original bug was that you'd try to set a breakpoint on a method
36 # (e.g., `break s::method1'), and you'd get an error, but if you
37 # repeated the command, it would work the second time:
39 # (gdb) break s::method1
40 # the class s does not have any method named method1
41 # Hint: try 's::method1<TAB> or 's::method1<ESC-?>
42 # (Note leading single quote.)
43 # (gdb) break s::method1
44 # Breakpoint 1 at 0x804841b: file psmang1.cc, line 13.
47 # We observed this bug first using Stabs, and then using Dwarf 2.
49 # The problem was in lookup_symbol_aux: when looking up s::method1, it
50 # would fail to find it in any symtabs, find the minsym with the
51 # corresponding mangled name (say, `_ZN1S7method1Ev'), pass the
52 # minsym's address to find_pc_sect_symtab to look up the symtab
53 # (causing the compilation unit's full symbols to be read in), and
54 # then look up the symbol in that symtab's global block. All that is
55 # correct. However, it would pass the minsym's name as the NAME
56 # argument to lookup_block_symbol; a minsym's name is mangled, whereas
57 # lookup_block_symbol's NAME argument should be demangled.
59 # This is a pretty simple bug, but it turns out to be a bear to
60 # construct a test for. That's why this test case is so delicate. If
61 # you can see how to make it less so, please contribute a patch.
63 # Here are the twists:
65 # The bug only manifests itself when we call lookup_symbol to look up
66 # a method name (like "s::method1" or "s::method2"), and that method's
67 # definition is in a compilation unit for which we have read partial
68 # symbols, but not full symbols. The partial->full conversion must be
69 # caused by that specific lookup. (If we already have full symbols
70 # for the method's compilation unit, we won't need to look up the
71 # minsym, find the symtab for the minsym's address, and then call
72 # lookup_block_symbol; it's that last call where things go awry.)
74 # Now, when asked to set a breakpoint at `s::method1', GDB will first
75 # look up `s' to see if that is, in fact, the name of a class, and
76 # then look up 's::method1'. So we have to make sure that looking up
77 # `s' doesn't cause full symbols to be read for the compilation unit
78 # containing the definition of `s::method1'.
80 # The partial symbol tables for `psmang1.cc' and `psmang2.cc' will
81 # both have entries for `s'; GDB will read full symbols for whichever
82 # compilation unit's partial symbol table appears first in the
83 # objfile's list. The order in which compilation units appear in the
84 # partial symbol table list depends on how the program is linked, and
85 # how the debug info reader does the partial symbol scan. Ideally,
86 # the test shouldn't rely on them appearing in any particular order.
88 # So, since we don't know which compilation unit's full symbols are
89 # going to get read, we simply try looking up one method from each of
90 # the two compilation units. One of them has to come after the other
91 # in the partial symbol table list, so whichever comes later will
92 # still need its partial symbols read by the time we go to look up
95 # Second twist: don't move the common definition of `struct s' into a
96 # header file. If the compiler emits identical stabs for the
97 # #inclusion of that header file into psmang1.cc and into psmang2.cc,
98 # then the linker will do stabs compression, and replace one of the
99 # BINCL/EINCL regions with an EXCL stab, pointing to the other
100 # BINCL/EINCL region. GDB will read this, and record that the
101 # compilation unit that got the EXCL depends on the compilation unit
102 # that kept the BINCL/EINCL. Then, when it decides it needs to read
103 # full symbols for the former, it'll also read full symbols for the
104 # latter. Now, if it just so happens that the compilation unit that
105 # got the EXCL is also the first one with a definition of `s' in the
106 # partial symbol table list, then that first probe for `s' will cause
107 # both compilation units' full symbols to be read --- again defeating
110 # We could work around this by having three compilation units, or by
111 # ensuring that the header file produces different stabs each time
112 # it's #included, but it seems simplest just to avoid compilation unit
113 # dependencies altogether, drop the header file, and duplicate the
114 # (pretty trivial) struct definition.
116 # Note that #including any header file at all into both compilation
117 # units --- say, <stdio.h> --- could create this sort of dependency.
119 # This is the aspect of the test which the debug format is most likely
120 # to affect, I think. The different formats create different kinds of
121 # inter-CU dependencies, which could mask the bug. It might be
122 # possible for the test to check that at least one of the partial
123 # symtabs remains unread, and fail otherwise --- the failure
124 # indicating that the test itself isn't going to catch the bug it was
125 # meant to, not that GDB is misbehaving.
127 # Third twist: given the way lookup_block_symbol is written, it's
128 # possible to find the symbol even when it gets passed a mangled name
129 # for its NAME parameter. There are three ways lookup_block_symbol
130 # might search a block, depending on how it was constructed:
132 # linear search. In this case, this bug will never manifest itself,
133 # since we check every symbol against NAME using SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME.
134 # Since that macro checks its second argument (NAME) against both the
135 # mangled and demangled names of the symbol, this will always find the
136 # symbol successfully, so, no bug.
138 # hash table. If both the mangled and demangled names hash to the
139 # same bucket, then you'll again find the symbol "by accident", since
140 # we search the entire bucket using SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME. Since GDB
141 # chooses the number of buckets based on the number of symbols, small
142 # compilation units may have only one hash bucket; in this case, the
143 # search always succeeds, even though we hashed on the wrong name.
144 # This test works around that by having a lot of dummy variables,
145 # making it less likely that the mangled and demangled names fall in
148 # binary search. (GDB 5.2 produced these sorts of blocks, and this
149 # test tries to detect the bug there, but subsequent versions of GDB
150 # almost never build them, and they may soon be removed entirely.) In
151 # this case, the symbols in the block are sorted by their
152 # SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (whose behavior depends on the current demangling
153 # setting, so that's wrong, but let's try to stay focussed).
154 # lookup_block_symbol does a binary search comparing NAME with
155 # SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME until the range has been narrowed down to only a
156 # few symbols; then it starts a linear search forward from the lower
157 # end of that range, until it reaches a symbol whose
158 # SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME follows NAME in lexicographic order. This means
159 # that, if you're doing a binary search for a mangled name in a block
160 # sorted by SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME, you might find the symbol `by
161 # accident' if the mangled and demangled names happen to fall near
162 # each other in the ordering. The initial version of this patch used
163 # a class called `S'; all the other symbols in the compilation unit
164 # started with lower-case letters, so the demangled name `S::method1'
165 # sorted at the same place as the mangled name `_ZN1S7method1Ev': at
166 # the very beginning. Using a lower-case 's' as the name ensures that
167 # the demangled name falls after all the dummy symbols introduced for
168 # the hash table, as described above.
170 # This is all so tortured, someone will probably come up with still
171 # other ways this test could fail to do its job. If you need to make
172 # revisions, please be very careful.
175 # test running programs
179 if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
181 set testfile "psmang"
182 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
184 if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
188 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc" "${testfile}1.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
193 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc" "${testfile}2.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
198 if { [gdb_compile "${testfile}1.o ${testfile}2.o" ${binfile} executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
206 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
209 gdb_test "break s::method1" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang1.cc.*"
211 # We have to exit and restart GDB here, to make sure that all the
212 # compilation units are psymtabs again.
216 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
219 gdb_test "break s::method2" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang2.cc.*"