2 # (C) Copyright 2014 Google, Inc
3 # Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
5 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
8 DEPRECATION NOTICE FOR arch/<arch>/lib/board.c
10 For board maintainers: Please submit patches for boards you maintain before
11 July 2014, to make them use generic board.
13 For architecture maintainers: Please submit patches to remove your
14 architecture-specific board.c file before October 2014.
20 U-Boot has traditionally had a board.c file for each architecture. This has
21 introduced quite a lot of duplication, with each architecture tending to do
22 initialisation slightly differently. To address this, a new 'generic board
23 init' feature was introduced a year ago in March 2013 (further motivation is
24 provided in the cover letter below).
30 The main change is that the arch/<arch>/lib/board.c file is being removed in
31 favour of common/board_f.c (for pre-relocation init) and common/board_r.c
32 (for post-relocation init).
34 Related to this, the global_data and bd_t structures now have a core set of
35 fields which are common to all architectures. Architecture-specific fields
36 have been moved to separate structures.
39 Supported Arcthitectures
40 ------------------------
42 If you are unlucky then your architecture may not support generic board.
43 The following architectures are supported now:
57 If your architecture is not supported, you need to select
58 HAVE_GENERIC_BOARD in arch/Kconfig
59 and test it with a suitable board, as follows.
62 Adding Support for your Board
63 -----------------------------
65 To enable generic board for your board, define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in
66 your board config header file.
68 Test that U-Boot still functions correctly on your board, and fix any
69 problems you find. Don't be surprised if there are no problems - generic
70 board has had a reasonable amount of testing with common boards.
76 Please don't take this the wrong way - there is no intent to make your life
77 miserable, and we have the greatest respect and admiration for U-Boot users.
78 However, with any migration there has to be a period where the old way is
79 deprecated and removed. Every patch to the deprecated code introduces a
80 potential breakage in the new unused code. Therefore:
82 Boards or architectures not converted over to general board by the
83 end of 2014 may be forcibly changed over (potentially causing run-time
91 The full text of the original generic board series is reproduced below.
95 This series creates a generic board.c implementation which contains
96 the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files.
98 What is the motivation for this change?
100 1. There is a lot of repeated code in the board.c files. Any change to
101 things like setting up the baud rate requires a change in 10 separate
104 2. Since there are 10 separate files, adding a new feature which requires
105 initialisation is painful since it must be independently added in 10
108 3. As time goes by the architectures naturely diverge since there is limited
109 pressure to compare features or even CONFIG options against simiilar things
110 in other board.c files.
112 4. New architectures must implement all the features all over again, and
113 sometimes in subtley different ways. This places an unfair burden on getting
114 a new architecture fully functional and running with U-Boot.
116 5. While it is a bit of a tricky change, I believe it is worthwhile and
117 achievable. There is no requirement that all code be common, only that
118 the code that is common should be located in common/board.c rather than
119 arch/xxx/lib/board.c.
121 All the functions of board_init_f() and board_init_r() are broken into
122 separate function calls so that they can easily be included or excluded
123 for a particular architecture. It also makes it easier to adopt Graeme's
124 initcall proposal when it is ready.
126 http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/114499.html
128 This series removes the dependency on generic relocation. So relocation
129 happens as one big chunk and is still completely arch-specific. See the
130 relocation series for a proposed solution to this for ARM:
132 http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-December/112928.html
134 or Graeme's recent x86 series v2:
136 http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/114467.html
138 Instead of moving over a whole architecture, this series takes the approach
139 of simply enabling generic board support for an architecture. It is then up
140 to each board to opt in by defining CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in the board
141 config file. If this is not done, then the code will be generated as
142 before. This allows both sets of code to co-exist until we are comfortable
143 with the generic approach, and enough boards run.
145 ARM is a relatively large board.c file and one which I can test, therefore
146 I think it is a good target for this series. On the other hand, x86 is
147 relatively small and simple, but different enough that it introduces a
148 few issues to be solved. So I have chosen both ARM and x86 for this series.
149 After a suggestion from Wolfgang I have added PPC also. This is the
150 largest and most feature-full board, so hopefully we have all bases
153 A generic global_data structure is also required. This might upset a few
154 people. Here is my basic reasoning: most fields are the same, all
155 architectures include and need it, most global_data.h files already have
156 #ifdefs to select fields for a particular SOC, so it is hard to
157 see why architecures are different in this area. We can perhaps add a
158 way to put architecture-specific fields into a separate header file, but
159 for now I have judged that to be counter-productive.
161 Similarly we need a generic bd_info structure, since generic code will
162 be accessing it. I have done this in the same way as global_data and the
165 There was dicussion on the list about passing gd_t around as a parameter
166 to pre-relocation init functions. I think this makes sense, but it can
167 be done as a separate change, and this series does not require it.
169 While this series needs to stand on its own (as with the link script
170 cleanup series and the generic relocation series) the goal is the
171 unification of the board init code. So I hope we can address issues with
172 this in mind, rather than focusing too narrowly on particular ARM, x86 or
175 I have run-tested ARM on Tegra Seaboard only. To try it out, define
176 CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD in your board file and rebuild. Most likely on
177 x86 and PPC at least it will hang, but if you are lucky it will print
180 I have run this though MAKEALL with CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD on for all
181 ARM, PPC and x86 boards. There are a few failures due to errors in
182 the board config, which I have sent patches for. The main issue is
183 just the difference between __bss_end and __bss_end__.
185 Note: the first group of commits are required for this series to build,
186 but could be separated out if required. I have included them here for
191 Simon Glass, sjg@chromium.org