3 Stuff that needs to be done. This is organized by who plans to get around to
4 doing it eventually, but that doesn't mean they "own" the item. If you want to
5 do one of these bounce an email off the person it's listed under to see if they
6 have any suggestions how they plan to go about it, and to minimize conflicts
7 between your work and theirs. But otherwise, all of these are fair game.
9 Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>:
10 Add BB_NOMMU to platform.h and migrate __uClinux__ tests to that.
11 #if defined __UCLIBC__ && !defined __ARCH_USE_MMU__
12 Add a libbb/platform.c
13 Implement fdprintf() for platforms that haven't got one.
14 Implement bb_realpath() that can handle NULL on non-glibc.
17 Migrate calloc() and bb_calloc() occurrences to bb_xzalloc().
18 Remove obsolete _() wrapper crud for internationalization we don't do.
19 Figure out where we need utf8 support, and add it.
22 The command shell situation is a big mess. We have three or four different
23 shells that don't really share any code, and the "standalone shell" doesn't
24 work all that well (especially not in a chroot environment), due to apps not
25 being reentrant. I'm writing a new shell (bbsh) to unify the various
26 shells and configurably add the minimal set of bash features people
27 actually use. The hardest part is it has to configure down as small as
28 lash while providing lash's features. The rest is easy in comparison.
30 Compression-side support.
32 General cleanup (should use ENABLE_FEATURE_INIT_SYSLOG and ENABLE_FEATURE_INIT_DEBUG).
33 Unify base64 handling.
34 There's base64 encoding and decoding going on in:
35 networking/wget.c:base64enc()
36 coreutils/uudecode.c:read_base64()
37 coreutils/uuencode.c:tbl_base64[]
38 networking/httpd.c:decodeBase64()
39 And probably elsewhere. That needs to be unified into libbb functions.
41 Look at the full Single Unix Specification version 3 (available online at
42 "http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/nfindex.html") and
43 figure out which of our apps are compliant, and what we're missing that
44 we might actually care about.
46 Even better would be some kind of automated compliance test harness that
47 exercises each command line option and the various corner cases.
49 How much internationalization should we do?
51 The low hanging fruit is UTF-8 character set support. We should do this.
52 (Vodz pointed out the shell's cmdedit as needing work here. What else?)
54 We also have lots of hardwired english text messages. Consolidating this
55 into some kind of message table not only makes translation easier, but
56 also allows us to consolidate redundant (or close) strings.
58 We probably don't want to be bloated with locale support. (Not unless we
59 can cleanly export it from our underlying C library without having to
60 concern ourselves with it directly. Perhaps a few specific things like a
61 config option for "date" are low hanging fruit here?)
63 What level should things happen at? How much do we care about
64 internationalizing the text console when X11 and xterms are so much better
65 at it? (There's some infrastructure here we don't implement: The
66 "unicode_start" and "unicode_stop" shell scripts need "vt-is-UTF8" and a
67 --unicode option to loadkeys. That implies a real loadkeys/dumpkeys
68 implementation to replace loadkmap/dumpkmap. Plus messing with console font
69 loading. Is it worth it, or do we just say "use X"?)
71 Individual compilation of applets.
72 It would be nice if busybox had the option to compile to individual applets,
73 for people who want an alternate implementation less bloated than the gnu
74 utils (or simply with less political baggage), but without it being one big
77 Turning libbb into a real dll is another possibility, especially if libbb
78 could export some of the other library interfaces we've already more or less
79 got the code for (like zlib).
80 buildroot - Make a "dogfood" option
81 Busybox 1.1 will be capable of replacing most gnu packages for real world
82 use, such as developing software or in a live CD. It needs wider testing.
84 Busybox should now be able to replace bzip2, coreutils, e2fsprogs, file,
85 findutils, gawk, grep, inetutils, less, modutils, net-tools, patch, procps,
86 sed, shadow, sysklogd, sysvinit, tar, util-linux, and vim. The resulting
87 system should be self-hosting (I.E. able to rebuild itself from source
88 code). This means it would need (at least) binutils, gcc, and make, or
91 It would be a good "eating our own dogfood" test if buildroot had the option
92 of using a "make allyesconfig" busybox instead of the all of the above
93 packages. Anything that's wrong with the resulting system, we can fix. (It
94 would be nice to be able to upgrade busybox to be able to replace bash and
95 diffutils as well, but we're not there yet.)
97 One example of an existing system that does this already is Firmware Linux:
98 http://www.landley.net/code/firmware
100 Busybox should have a sample initramfs build script. This depends on
101 bbsh, mdev, and switch_root.
104 Bernhard Fischer <rep.nop@anon.at>:
106 make -j is broken, -j1 is forced atm
109 Collate BUFSIZ IOBUF_SIZE MY_BUF_SIZE PIPE_PROGRESS_SIZE BUFSIZE PIPESIZE
110 Use bb_common_bufsiz1?
116 doesn't understand (), lots of susv3 stuff.
119 Make sure we handle empty files properly:
120 From the patch man page:
122 you can remove a file by sending out a context diff that compares
123 the file to be deleted with an empty file dated the Epoch. The
124 file will be removed unless patch is conforming to POSIX and the
125 -E or --remove-empty-files option is not given.
128 Should have simple fuzz factor support to apply patches at an offset which
129 shouldn't take up too much space.
131 And while we're at it, a new patch filename quoting format is apparently
132 coming soon: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112927316408690&w=2
135 It would be nice to have a man command. Not one that handles troff or
136 anything, just one that can handle preformatted ascii man pages, possibly
137 compressed. This could probably be a script in the extras directory that
138 calls cat/zcat/bzcat | less
140 (How doclifter might work into this is anybody's guess.)
146 turn FEATURE_DEBUG_OPT into ENABLE_FEATURE_CROND_DEBUG_OPT
148 Architectural issues:
150 bb_close() with fsync()
151 We should have a bb_close() in place of normal close, with a CONFIG_ option
152 to not just check the return value of close() for an error, but fsync().
153 Close can't reliably report anything useful because if write() accepted the
154 data then it either went out to the network or it's in cache or a pipe
155 buffer. Either way, there's no guarantee it'll make it to its final
156 destination before close() gets called, so there's no guarantee that any
157 error will be reported.
159 You need to call fsync() if you care about errors that occur after write(),
160 but that can have a big performance impact. So make it a config option.
163 Lots of archivers have the same general infrastructure. The directory
164 traversal code should be factored out, and the guts of each archiver could
165 be some setup code and a series of callbacks for "add this file",
166 "add this directory", "add this symlink" and so on.
168 This could clean up tar and zip, and make it cheaper to add cpio and ar
169 write support, and possibly even cheaply add things like mkisofs or
170 mksquashfs someday, if they become relevant.
173 Several existing applets (sort, vi, less...) read
174 a whole file into memory and act on it. There might be an opportunity
175 for shared code in there that could be moved into libbb...
178 We have a CONFIG_BUFFER mechanism that lets us select whether to do memory
179 allocation on the stack or the heap. Unfortunately, we're not using it much.
180 We need to audit our memory allocations and turn a lot of malloc/free calls
181 into RESERVE_CONFIG_BUFFER/RELEASE_CONFIG_BUFFER.
182 For a start, see e.g. make CFLAGS_EXTRA=-Wlarger-than-64
184 And while we're at it, many of the CONFIG_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP #ifdefs will be
185 optimized out by the compiler in the stack allocation case (since there's no
186 free for an alloca()), and this means that various cleanup loops that just
187 call free might also be optimized out by the compiler if written right, so
188 we can yank those #ifdefs too, and generally clean up the code.
190 Switch CONFIG_SYMBOLS to ENABLE_SYMBOLS
192 In busybox 1.0 and earlier, configuration was done by CONFIG_SYMBOLS
193 that were either defined or undefined to indicate whether the symbol was
194 selected in the .config file. They were used with #ifdefs, ala:
202 In 1.1, we have new ENABLE_SYMBOLS which are always defined (as 0 or 1),
203 meaning you can still use them for preprocessor tests by replacing
204 "#ifdef CONFIG_SYMBOL" with "#if ENABLE_SYMBOL". But more importantly, we
205 can use them as a true or false test in normal C code:
207 if (ENABLE_SYMBOL && other_test) {
211 (Optimizing away if() statements that resolve to a constant value
212 is known as "dead code elimination", an optimization so old and simple that
213 Turbo Pascal for DOS did it twenty years ago. Even modern mini-compilers
214 like the Tiny C Compiler (tcc) and the Small Device C Compiler (SDCC)
215 perform dead code elimination.)
217 Right now, busybox.h is #including both "config.h" (defining the
218 CONFIG_SYMBOLS) and "bb_config.h" (defining the ENABLE_SYMBOLS). At some
219 point in the future, it would be nice to wean ourselves off of the
220 CONFIG versions. (Among other things, some defective build environments
221 leak the Linux kernel's CONFIG_SYMBOLS into the system's standard #include
222 files. We've experienced collisions before.)
225 This is more an unresolved issue than a to-do item. More thought is needed.
227 Normally we rely on exit() to free memory, close files, and unmap segments
228 for us. This makes most calls to free(), close(), and unmap() optional in
229 busybox applets that don't intend to run for very long, and optional stuff
230 can be omitted to save size.
232 The idea was raised that we could simulate fork/exit with setjmp/longjmp
233 for _really_ brainless embedded systems, or speed up the standalone shell
234 by not forking. Doing so would require a reliable FEATURE_CLEAN_UP.
235 Unfortunately, this isn't as easy as it sounds.
237 The problem is, lots of things exit(), sometimes unexpectedly (xmalloc())
238 and sometimes reliably (bb_perror_msg_and_die() or show_usage()). This
239 jumps out of the normal flow control and bypasses any cleanup code we
240 put at the end of our applets.
242 It's possible to add hooks to libbb functions like xmalloc() and bb_xopen()
243 to add their entries to a linked list, which could be traversed and
244 freed/closed automatically. (This would need to be able to free just the
245 entries after a checkpoint to be usable for a forkless standalone shell.
246 You don't want to free the shell's own resources.)
248 Right now, FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is more or less a debugging aid, to make things
249 like valgrind happy. It's also documentation of _what_ we're trusting
250 exit() to clean up for us. But new infrastructure to auto-free stuff would
251 render the existing FEATURE_CLEAN_UP code redundant.
253 For right now, exit() handles it just fine.
258 watchdog.c could autodetect the timer duration via:
259 if(!ioctl (fd, WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT, &tmo)) timer_duration = 1 + (tmo / 2);
260 Unfortunately, that needs linux/watchdog.h and that contains unfiltered
261 kernel types on some distros, which breaks the build.
263 use bb_error_msg where appropriate: See
264 egrep "(printf.*\([[:space:]]*(stderr|2)|[^_]write.*\([[:space:]]*(stderr|2))"
266 use bb_perror_msg where appropriate: See
269 Remove superfluous fmt occurances: e.g.
270 fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s not found\n", "unalias", *argptr);
271 -> fprintf(stderr, "unalias: %s not found\n", *argptr);
277 Replace deprecated functions.
281 sigblock(), siggetmask(), sigsetmask(), sigmask() -> sigprocmask et al
283 vdprintf() -> similar sized functionality