1 The guidelines in this file are the ideals; it's better to send a
2 not-fully-following-guidelines patch than no patch at all, though. We
3 can always polish it up.
8 The D-BUS mailing list is message-bus-list@freedesktop.org; discussion
9 of patches, etc. should go there.
14 Most of D-BUS is security sensitive. Guidelines related to that:
16 - avoid memcpy(), sprintf(), strlen(), snprintf, strlcat(),
17 strstr(), strtok(), or any of this stuff. Use DBusString.
18 If DBusString doesn't have the feature you need, add it
21 There are some exceptions, for example
22 if your strings are just used to index a hash table
23 and you don't do any parsing/modification of them, perhaps
24 DBusString is wasteful and wouldn't help much. But definitely
25 if you're doing any parsing, reallocation, etc. use DBusString.
27 - do not include system headers outside of dbus-memory.c,
28 dbus-sysdeps.c, and other places where they are already
29 included. This gives us one place to audit all external
30 dependencies on features in libc, etc.
32 - do not use libc features that are "complicated"
33 and may contain security holes. For example, you probably shouldn't
34 try to use regcomp() to compile an untrusted regular expression.
35 Regular expressions are just too complicated, and there are many
36 different libc's out there.
38 - we need to design the message bus daemon (and any similar features)
39 to use limited privileges, run in a chroot jail, and so on.
41 http://vsftpd.beasts.org/ has other good security suggestions.
46 - The C library uses GNU coding conventions, with GLib-like
47 extensions (e.g. lining up function arguments). The
48 Qt wrapper uses KDE coding conventions.
50 - Write docs for all non-static functions and structs and so on. try
51 "doxygen Doxyfile" prior to commit and be sure there are no
54 - All external interfaces (network protocols, file formats, etc.)
55 should have documented specifications sufficient to allow an
56 alternative implementation to be written. Our implementation should
57 be strict about specification compliance (should not for example
58 heuristically parse a file and accept not-well-formed
59 data). Avoiding heuristics is also important for security reasons;
60 if it looks funny, ignore it (or exit, or disconnect).
65 To make a release of D-BUS, do the following:
67 - check out a fresh copy from CVS
69 - increment the version number in configure.in
71 - verify that the libtool versioning/library soname is
72 changed if it needs to be, or not changed if not
74 - update the file NEWS based on the ChangeLog
76 - add a ChangeLog entry containing the version number
77 you're releasing ("Released 0.3" or something)
78 so people can see which changes were before and after
81 - "make distcheck" (DO NOT just "make dist" - pass the check!)
83 - if make distcheck fails, fix it.
85 - once distcheck succeeds, "cvs commit"
87 - if someone else made changes and the commit fails,
88 you have to "cvs up" and run "make distcheck" again
90 - once the commit succeeds, "cvs tag DBUS_X_Y_Z" where
91 X_Y_Z map to version X.Y.Z
93 - bump the version number up in configure.in, and commit
94 it. Make sure you do this *after* tagging the previous
97 - scp your tarball to freedesktop.org server and copy it
98 to /srv/dbus.freedesktop.org/releases. This should
99 be possible if you're in group "dbus"
101 - update the wiki page http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/dbus by
102 adding the new release under the Download heading. Then, cut the
103 link and changelog for the previous that was there.
105 - update the wiki page
106 http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/DbusReleaseArchive pasting the
107 previous release. Note that bullet points for each of the changelog
108 items must be indented three more spaces to conform to the
109 formatting of the other releases there.
111 - post to dbus@lists.freedesktop.org announcing the release.
114 Environment variables
117 These are the environment variables that are used by the D-BUS client library
120 Turns on printing verbose messages. This only works if D-BUS has been
121 compiled with --enable-verbose-mode
123 DBUS_MALLOC_FAIL_NTH=n
124 Can be set to a number, causing every nth call to dbus_alloc or
125 dbus_realloc to fail. This only works if D-BUS has been compiled with
128 DBUS_MALLOC_FAIL_GREATER_THAN=n
129 Can be set to a number, causing every call to dbus_alloc or
130 dbus_realloc to fail if the number of bytes to be allocated is greater
131 than the specified number. This only works if D-BUS has been compiled with
134 DBUS_TEST_MALLOC_FAILURES=n
135 Many of the D-BUS tests will run over and over, once for each malloc
136 involved in the test. Each run will fail a different malloc, plus some
137 number of mallocs following that malloc (because a fair number of bugs
138 only happen if two or more mallocs fail in a row, e.g. error recovery
139 that itself involves malloc). This env variable sets the number of
141 Here's why you care: If set to 0, then the malloc checking is skipped,
142 which makes the test suite a heck of a lot faster. Just run with this
143 env variable unset before you commit.
148 These are the test programs that are built if dbus is compiled using
152 This is the main unit test program that tests all aspects of the D-BUS
156 This it the unit test program for the message bus.
159 A test that tries to break the message loader by passing it randomly
160 created invalid messages.
162 "make check" runs all the deterministic test programs (i.e. not break-loader).
164 "make check-coverage" is available if you configure with --enable-gcov and
165 gives a complete report on test suite coverage. You can also run
166 "test/decode-gcov foo.c" on any source file to get annotated source,
167 after running make check with a gcov-enabled tree.
172 Please file them at http://bugzilla.freedesktop.org under component
173 dbus, and also post to the mailing list for discussion. The commit
176 - for fixes that don't affect API or protocol, they can be committed
177 if any one qualified reviewer other than patch author
180 - for fixes that do affect API or protocol, two people
181 in the reviewer group have to review and approve the commit, and
182 posting to the list is definitely mandatory
184 - if there's a live unresolved controversy about a change,
185 don't commit it while the argument is still raging.
187 - regardless of reviews, to commit a patch:
188 - make check must pass
189 - the test suite must be extended to cover the new code
190 as much as reasonably feasible
191 - the patch has to follow the portability, security, and
193 - the patch should as much as reasonable do one thing,
194 not many unrelated changes
195 No reviewer should approve a patch without these attributes, and
196 failure on these points is grounds for reverting the patch.
198 The reviewer group that can approve patches: Havoc Pennington, Michael
199 Meeks, Alex Larsson, Zack Rusin, Joe Shaw, Mikael Hallendal, Richard
200 Hult, Owen Fraser-Green, Olivier Andrieu.