1 ## Khronos Group Vulkan-Tools Repository Management
3 # **Open Source Project
\96 Objectives**
6 - The goal is for tool and utility behavior to assist in the development of vulkan applications.
7 - [Core Specification](https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/specs/1.0/html/vkspec.html)
8 - [Header Files](https://www.khronos.org/registry/vulkan/#headers)
9 - [SDK Resources](https://vulkan.lunarg.com)
11 - Updates of tools and utilities should be available in a timely fashion
12 - Every effort will be made to be responsive to ISV issues
13 * Cross Platform Compatibility
14 - Google and LunarG collaboration:
15 - Google: Monitor for Android
16 - LunarG: Monitor for desktop (Windows, Linux, and MacOS)
17 - Continuous Integration: HW test farms operated by Google and LunarG monitor various hardware/software platforms
19 - Repo remains in healthy state with all tests passing and good-quality, consistent codebase
20 - Continuous Integration: Along with Github, HW test farms operated by Google and LunarG perform pre-commit cloud testing
23 # **Roles and Definitions**
24 * Contributor, Commenter, User
25 - Submitting contributions, creating issues, or using the contents of the repository
27 - Experienced project members who have made significant technical contributions
28 - Write control: Approve pull/merge requests (verify submissions vs. acceptance criteria)
29 * Technical Project Leads
30 - Lead the project in terms of versioning, quality assurance, and overarching objectives
31 - Monitor github issues and drive timely resolution
32 - Designate new approvers
33 - Ensure project information such as the Readme, Contributing docs, wiki, etc., kept up-to-date
34 - Act as a facilitator in resolving technical conflicts
35 - Is a point-of-contact for project-related questions
37 The technical project leads for this repository are:
38 * **Jeremy Kniager** [jeremyk@lunarg.com](mailto:jeremyk@lunarg.com)
40 # **Acceptance Criteria and Process**
41 - All source code to include Khronos copyright and license (Apache 2.0).
42 - Additional copyrights of contributors appended
43 - Contributions are via pull requests
44 - Project leads will assigning approvers to contributor pull requests
45 - Approvers can self-assign their reviewers
46 - For complex or invasive contributions, Project Leads may request approval from specific reviewers
47 - At least one review approval is required to complete a pull request
48 - The goal is to be responsive to contributors while ensuring acceptance criteria is met and to facilitate their submissions
49 - Approval is dependent upon adherence to the guidelines in [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md), and alignment with
50 repository goals of maintainability, completeness, and quality
51 - Conflicts or questions will ultimately be resolved by the project leads